Saturday, October 22, 2011

Reductionism porn


The main thrust of the consilience world view  is that culture … will make complete sense only when linked in causal explanation to the natural sciences.  … I know that such reductionism is not popular outside the natural sciences. … The difference between the two domains is in the magnitude of the problem, not the principles needed for its solution.
Edward O. Wilson, Consilience (1998), p. 267

There are not “two” domains, but a couple of bunches;  set that aside.  Even within the natural sciences -- nay  let us further even restrict ourselves to physics:  there are several domains within physics, each with its own principles and techniques.   Those of thermodynamics were developed in their own realm, quite apart from the details of each atom.  (Later, a certain reduction to statistical mechanics was achieved -- indeed, one author cites this as the only completely successful instance of a broad reduction, within physics or indeed science at all.)  Quantum mechanics notoriously is a world apart.  String theory, yet another world, straining for any contact with this one.    Crystallography, cosmology, planetology, low-temperature physics, materials science  -- each boasts a clique of adepts  initiated into the Masonic mysteries of their own particular discipline (which alas, by its very success and progress, threatens to fragment further),  no one of whom could explain the principles and techniques of any other.  Which principles did the professor have in mind, for, say, the analysis of the Elizabethan theatre?  Heisenberg Uncertainty?  Maldacena duality?  Allopatric speciation?  (“Certain memes play out upon the stage, in full sight of the audience.  We call these the ‘observables’; they are given by Hermitian operators.”)

Each new horizon of science has brought with it  a new problematics, evoking new principles and new tools  not remotely to have been anticipated.  Some things now taken for granted, such as spacetime, and curved spacetime, and the various possible geometries for the universe as a whole, would previously have counted as analytically false  by the Kantians, space and time and Euclidean geometry being categories that were unquestionable and simply given.  It would be surprising if, say, a unified theory of the forces of nature turned out to consist of the old horse of the hyperweak simply hitched up to the wagon of general relativity and off you go.   Nor is a deeper understanding of free will or interpersonal communication or our emergent intellectual resonance with the most abstract mathematical principles imaginable,  likely to just fall out of the petri slime and the endless button-pushing experiments of the neuroscientists -- though they try, O Lord, they try.

History porn


We now pass to the final archetype of the epic tableau, the keepers of the innermost room.  The more radical Enlightenment writers, alert to the implications of scientific materialism, moved to reassess God himself.  They invented a Creator obedient to His own natural laws, the belief known as deism.
Edward O. Wilson, Consilience (1998), p. 32

This is the language of movie advertising, of the sort aimed at youngsters who chew gum.

An alternate view:


Some bored aristocrats found it amusing to cock a snook at tradition and decency;  they were not forced into this stance by any recent or irrefutable findings of science; but in the context of the time, it helped them get laid. For the philosophy of reductive materialism, the world did not have to wait until the days of Newton (who in any event  was not a materialist) -- they could get it way back with Thales.   But let it pass, let it pass;  the Enlightenment figures frequented all the best salons, and heard the old ideas as wittily retwittered by the fops of fashion.  “If you want me,” says Voltaire, bearing off a large plate of sandwiches, “I shall be in the innermost room… “ (a moan and a shiver passes among the assembled ladies) “... on a porcelain throne ... disinventing God”.

The Parable of the Samaritan

We read in chapter 10 of Luke:

A certain man went down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and fell among thieves, which stripped him of his raiment, and wounded him, and departed, leaving him half dead.
 31And by chance there came down a certain priest that way: and when he saw him, he passed by on the other side.
 32And likewise a Levite, when he was at the place, came and looked on him, and passed by on the other side.
 33But a certain Samaritan, as he journeyed, came where he was: and when he saw him, he had compassion on him,
 34And went to him, and bound up his wounds, pouring in oil and wine, and set him on his own beast, and brought him to an inn, and took care of him.
 35And on the morrow when he departed, he took out two pence, and gave them to the host, and said unto him, Take care of him; and whatsoever thou spendest more, when I come again, I will repay thee.

… Or not:


~

Viewing that chilling video, certain features recall the classic poem of A.E. Houseman, a meditation on the medieval painting "The Fall of Icarus":


"De val van Icarus", long attributed to Pieter Brueghel

About suffering they were never wrong,
The Old Masters; how well, they understood
Its human position; how it takes place
While someone else is eating or opening a window or just walking dully along;
How, when the aged are reverently, passionately waiting
For the miraculous birth, there always must be
Children who did not specially want it to happen, skating
On a pond at the edge of the wood:
They never forgot
That even the dreadful martyrdom must run its course
Anyhow in a corner, some untidy spot
Where the dogs go on with their doggy life and the torturer's horse
Scratches its innocent behind on a tree.
In Breughel's Icarus, for instance: how everything turns away
Quite leisurely from the disaster; the ploughman may
Have heard the splash, the forsaken cry,
But for him it was not an important failure; the sun shone
As it had to on the white legs disappearing into the green
Water; and the expensive delicate ship that must have seen
Something amazing, a boy falling out of the sky,
had somewhere to get to and sailed calmly on.


For -- the scene, as it unfolded -- and it  unfolded slowly -- was not at all what I had conjured up in imagination, reading the brief press account.  I had pictured a thronged urban street, pedestrians bicycles rickshaws cages of pigeons  cheek by wing by jowl, not an inch to squeeze by, vehicles speeding; and somewhere -- spot Waldo -- in the general crush, a tiny figure, little more than a shadow, accidentally jostled -- she falls -- is struck by a bumper -;  while the truck, oblivious in the general hullaballo, speeds on; and the passersby  either cannot make out the crumpled form half-hidden by vegetable crates, or, noticing, with visible bad conscience  avert their gaze and hurry on -- fearing, perhaps, involvement in some affair of the Tongs.


But not a bit of it.  An almost deserted Utrillo street;  the silhouette of a girl, quite unmistakable.  No traffic, no distractions;  the truck implacably bears down on her,  though there is even room to go around; crushes her like a bug. 
The truck pauses, you expect the driver to tumble out wailing -- or at least to loot her pinafore;  but no.  He has not crushed her quite enough, for her still partially solid body is peskily blocking his back wheel.  He backs up a bit, for greater traction, puts ‘er in gear; the mighty juggernaut strains -- visibly rises, and finally makes it over the defeated meat-mound.
Again, the way is clear.  The girl lies, not to the side out of sight, but right in the thoroughfare, in plain view.  Then strolling, quite leisurely, a certain ploughman of the modern day, as though licking an ice-cream cone…   Then a bicycle, going slowly, casually maneuvering around that thing in the road.  And another pedestrian -- none of these either staring in fascinated horror, or averting their gaze;  what lies bleeding there is only mildly interesting.  And then another juggernaut, expensive but not so delicate:  it too had somewhere to get to and, squushing what was left of her, rolled calmly on.


~     ~     ~

A thoughtful article that puts things into an unexpected perspective
(basically, it's even worse than it looks):


Good lord, it just gets worse and worse:
-->
" A fallen man pleads in vain for help in Hefei”

And China's  the future?  Lord preserve us.
~     ~     ~

Driving home from work the other day, I happened upon quite a different scene.
It was in the warehouse district  near where I live.  A small flock of Canada geese was venturing slowly across the road.   And all the guys in trucks were just … waiting for them, patiently.   There weren’t even any goslings to cuten up the scene:  just the awkward dignity of the adults, who seem uncomfortable as land-animals, and quite out of their element on asphalt.  Nobody honked; no-one inched forwards to hasten their hesitant gait.  We all just sat there and watched, and counted our blessings.   For yes, we each had somewhere to get to:  but so did the geese.  They needed to get to the other side.

~     ~     ~



Note:  If you benefitted from this post, you might wish to contemplate this video:



[Update 24 July 2012]

A walk, down to the dock: en route to which, amid the lower pond,  a tragedy  involving a duck.  Some subaqueous creature (presumably a turtle) had got hold of the leg of one, which was frantically ‘flying’, as though migrating to Canada, minute after minute, not budging an inch.  This could only end badly.
Its fellow ducks kept their distance, but seemingly unconcerned.  None of the passers-by  paused to take in the spectacle, nor were they curious, what we were staring at, my wife and I.

[Update 10 October 2012]
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/11/world/asia/xian-beating-becomes-symbol-of-nationalism-gone-awry.html?hpw&pagewanted=print
"What happened to Mr. Li, 51, was the ugliest known episode among anti-Japanese protests that convulsed cities in China last month after a longstanding dispute over an island chain erupted into fury. Mr. Li’s only offense, apparently, was driving a Japanese car. He ended up the victim of a mob..."
Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjfFFdT0cZU&noredirect=1

[Update 26 Dec 2012]  The denizens of the Middle Kingdom can be rather  casual when handling little kids:


In announcing the rescue of 89 abducted Chinese children on Christmas Eve, a senior police official said baby boys could now be purchased in China’s interior for less than $5,000 — and then resold for three times that amount in the wealthier coastal provinces.
The nationwide scourge of child abductions and baby selling in China first came prominently to light 10 years ago, when the police in Guangxi Province discovered 28 baby girls in the back of a long-distance bus.  The babies, all younger than 3 months, had been drugged to keep them quiet. News reports said they had been stuffed into tote bags. One baby died of suffocation.

[Update 4 Jan 2013] Likewise on the subcontinent, life is cheap:

The man who was beaten alongside the New Delhi gang rape victim said the two lay naked and bleeding while people idly passed by and police debated which police station was responsible, with more than two hours elapsing before they arrived at a hospital.
The young woman later died of severe internal injuries.



[Update 5 Jan]  A quite interesting "Freakonomics"-style contribution, from Erika Christakis:
http://ideas.time.com/2013/01/04/rape-in-india-a-result-of-sex-selection/
Predicably, the readers' comments reflect a refusal to even consider the relevance of such factors.
(Homework assignment:  Consider the effects on either gender, of Mormon polygamy.  [Hint:  It is not what you will read in the P.C. press.])

[Pour davantage sur l’Inde et les viols, dans le contexte-comparaison des flingueries américaines, consultez ceci:
http://worldofdrjustice.blogspot.com/2012/12/mental-health-and-gun-control.html  ]


*

Pour d’autres friandises
de la confiserie 
du docteur Justice,
consultez:

*
[Update 27 April 2013]

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/25/world/asia/25iht-letter25.html?src=rechp
The people of New Delhi have become increasingly better at street protests, even though it is a new experience for most of them. The Indian government, on the other hand, continues to bumble about with no talent for cooling down enraged citizens.
Over the past few days, faced with public outrage yet again, the government was unable to produce officials who were articulate or knew how to employ the language of tactical humility or could at least say the right things in the right manner. Nor was it able to ensure that the minister of home affairs did not doze off in Parliament as a female legislator was talking about yet another rape that has been at the heart of protests in the capital.
Last week, news broke that a 5-year-old girl had been raped and left to die, held captive in a small room for two days with no food or water. A doctor who treated her said that she had several injuries and that pieces of candle and a bottle had been inserted into her. The girl’s father told the news media that the police had offered him 2,000 rupees, or about $37, to keep quiet about the affair, and that he must be grateful she was alive.
Enraged crowds began to gather in various parts of New Delhi including outside the police headquarters. They demanded the resignation of the minister of home affairs and the police commissioner. Women waved cash at the faces of police officers to taunt them for having offered money to the child’s father. Meanwhile, a senior police officer was caught on camera slapping a young female protester.
There is nothing about the appearance of the New Delhi police, the most visible face of authority in the capital, that commands respect. Most of the young police officers look impoverished and undernourished. Many of the older ones are obese. They often stand in a languid way in their cheap, ill-fitting uniforms, and face angry protesters with chuckles or rustic curiosity. It is not unusual to see female officers amble through a demonstration, holding hands and chatting. A majority of those who are posted to control the crowds do not wear any protective gear. In fact, it is a wonder that it is not the police who flee during street protests.



Thursday, October 20, 2011

Duet (at a distance)



In the summer of 1960, I spent a couple of weeks (or maybe only a week; but at that age, it seemed like all summer), at Camp Bernie, in -- well, in a woods somewhere, and run by the YMCA.  Ike was still President; the nation was at peace.  I was ten years old; and I knew nothing about almost anything at all -- still pupating, you might say.

That summer, Hank Locklin had a country hit, "Please Help Me I'm Falling", which somehow I heard over and over at that camp.  My musical world was ordinarily circumscribed by Top-40 radio (taking it in, as a baby takes milk); C&W was not part of that world.  It must have been my counselor who kept listening to it.  (Those of you who follow these memoirs, may have met him already as the Tyrant of Table Two.  Still a teenager, and already a vet.  Least, so he said.)

My only active hormones at that age, were the ones that urge a lad in the direction of a hamburger.  I knew nothing of desire, nor of what adults can call love.  There were pop songs which indicated that boys felt things about girls -- from a hopeless distance, usually; and that girls felt -- well who knows what girls felt; time for that later.  These tunes treated of (what they called) "love", but not of consummated marriage.  The typical scenario involved: dreaming of a girl -- and this, generally on what philosophers would call the 'attributive reading' of the noun phrase: a girl, any girl; no one girl in particular.  Or, invoking Venus to send such an attributive entity.  In the unlikely event that this did come to pass, the sweethearts were swiftly separated (off vacationing with their families), and the burden of the song involved the composition of letters, to be sealed with a kiss.  (Mom to provide the actual stamp.) Only occasionally did we get a hint that, at the end of all these travails, lay marriage.  At most, a song might sing, sentimentally, of a wedding.  To get a picture of marriage itself, you pretty much had to go Country.

"Please Help Me I'm Falling" took the listener as far as marriage and then some -- to an astonishing, almost unimaginable state in which --  well, words fail.  A temptation to -- adults had a word for it, a very *adult* word; but it was not in my vocabulary; not then, and I wish it weren’t now.  It was like getting a glimpse of Relativity, or Heisenberg, before you'd studied Newton.

*

Since some of you reading this  were not yet born, when that song came out and later faded, I should quote some of the lyrics.  But this is with the utmost reluctance.  Bare words on a page cannot conjure up the scent of the grass in the meadows, the confused but slowly focussing musings of the boy dreaming there, chewing reflectively on one bold blade of that grass; notes drifting in from someone's radio; thoughts forming on the horizon like distant clouds.  You either lived it or you did not.
Well, here goes.

Please help me I'm falling
in love with you.
Close the door to temptation;
don't let me walk through.
Turn away from me darling
I'm begging you to
Please help me I'm falling
in love with you.

I belong to another
whose arms have grown cold
But I promised forever
to have and to hold
I can never be free, dear,
but when I'm with you
I know that I'm losing
the will to be true.


Such lines evoke the memory, no less and no more, as rock-scratchings might evoke the lays of Rome.

*

I never once heard that song, after leaving camp, but it has echoed in my head, forever.  And by the miracle of YouTube, which seems to herald the end of History as a linear structure, one can relive almost any seminal public experience one once had.  So I dialed up Hank Locklin, and heard the tune again.  Nothing much to report  -- not a madeleine experience, since I'd remembered every note in any case.

But what was eye-opening was an item in the "Related Videos" sidebar:  an answering song, by one Skeeter Davis, titled "(I Can't Help You) I'm Falling Too".



Now, I am not in general interested in cover versions, or re-runs, or sequels, especially by singers I've barely heard of.  What caught my attention here  requires a rather indirect introduction.  For, with the passage of time, and the yielding of hearts, I did at last get married (thanks be to God); and we were blessed with a child (praise Him); who has grown to manhood, and who moreover, after tribulations at least the equal of those his parents have known, is becoming quite an intellectual companion for his old dad, as I grow increasingly recondite.  To stimulate his philosophical reflections (for he is a carpenter by day, and we live not by bread alone), I  from time to time  mention some topic that has occupied me;  and the topic for yesterday was Duality.  This is a very general principle in mathematics, illustrable in the simplest set-theory, where intersection and union are mutually dual.  It then exfoliates luxuriantly in the upper regions, where its exemplars are often signalled by a prefix: covector; cohomology; cobordism.  One can spend a lifetime learning the subtleties of such endeavors.   Additionally, we may imagine how this abstract concept might illuminate other aspects of our experience.  One image condenses the analogy:  the relation of a sculpture, to the mould in which it is cast.  In a way they are opposites, in a way they're the same.   Consider next the simplest thing you might say to someone; say, "Morning, Bob!"  And consider the wealth of vectors which fill out this mask  -- your own motives in saying greeting him; in greeting him thus; in saying "Bob" rather than “Robert”; and the sheer explosive perhaps-unpremeditated action of your own free will, in thus blurting this out.  Now, dually, consider the impact, from Bob's point of view.  Bob's perception of your utterance is not a free-will act on his part; indeed, however welcome greetings in general, this one may have interrupted some private reverie. He -- But before he can respond audibly, some version of the preceding reflection has occurred to yourself, and --  (Set aside an afternoon, to think this through.)

*

So here we have a musical mirror-image, of a soul-forming song.  Potentially a pinnacle and distillation, of all those counter-thoughts of the never-attained belovèd -- the little red-head girl, whom we were too shy to address; the tentative offering of one not yet well known to us, for which we were not ready, and turned it aside with a jest; the lover lost through a misunderstanding.  Pang, upon pain, upon pang.  We never did yet know her mind, until at last she said: "I do."  (A unique moment of simultaneous union and intersection.)

It was with some trepidation that I clicked on the link; for since that first song was recorded, before Ike's doomed successor had yet won the fatal palm, a lot has gone down; and gone downwards.  (By the time the man was slain, taking much of America with him, he'd left his own vows in shreds, though we didn’t know it at the time.)  Tares planted in the Endarkenment (humorously known as the Enlightenment) have sprouted to weeds that choke the vacant lots where atheists briefly couple and depart -- unacquainted with Temptation, since now to desire is incontinently to take; and unable to commit adultery, being after all strangers to vows.

Fortunately  the answer-song's ethic was unstained by any of this, and was consistent with what we learned in Sunday School.  The original lyrics are echoed just enough to be appropriate, and not over-clever. Yet the vocalization, and the instrumentation, in this album version, were slick, and I was not satisfied.  More looking, another link -- to an old black&white video of a corny country venue -- the "Pet Milk Grand Ole Opry", from February of 1962.  (At which time, the assassin’s bullet  was still in the magazine.)
A brief and formulaic introduction; and then, to a much simplified intrumental accompaniment offscreen, and against a background that looks like a default set for Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood – an acoustic guitar  hastily hung upon the wall, as though to disguise the fact, that the selfsame backdrop had served, but the week before, for a Campbell’s Soup commercial, and would soon serve again, for Romper Room , --  Miss Davis, looking as though she just stepped off a Betty Crocker box, steps up to the mike.

[You too can watch it, here:


The phrasing is unvarnished, as befits a statement of fact.  The delivery, unhurried:  We have all the time in the world.  The tune is the same, and simple:  it has rung since we left Eden.

(The night late, moon shrouded in clouds, I rewatch the video, again and again, by way of correction, in rebuke to whatever I may once have envisioned  amiss.)
(This is not a young lady, whose career I have followed.  But urged by the instance, I consult further sources.  She is known (I learn)  as an early exemplar in the matter of country-to-pop crossover;  well, we all have our faults.  But as well:  as country, to plain gospel.  Google “I’ll Meet You in the Morning”,  “Child of the King” – ah!   God bless her.)
(Over and over, over and over… as though absorbing an alternative upbringing,   this time in a Christian household …)



She looked a lot like my girlfriends of the time (though at the same time, like somebody's mom  -- a face I have seen, at many a bake-sale  -- -- a face which, in the latter capacity, may once have frowned on me, as I reached, open-mouthed,  for a brownie: not realizing that these must be paid for):  Too tall for me; hairdo emblematic of the era; a modest and nondescript dress; not remarkably pretty if considered coldly: but of course we never considered anyone, anything coldly:  She's the sweetest durn thing on God's good green earth, enough to turn any lad's head. (Or else:  The best Mom a feller ever had.)  Voice no better than it need be (on this live performance without overdubbing), seemingly actually an unprofessional voice, more like what you might hear at a church social, or a family sing-along -- and you can bet, if I'd met her, I’d’ve asked for her hand:  and with God’s grace, she'd've become family, and brought forth a family, as my wedded wife.  (And I did -- and she did -- -- mutatis mutandis.)   She even kept the nickname her granddad gave her ("Skeeter", from “mosquito”, from an active little girl's tendency to buzz around all over the place -- boys too).  I like that in a girl.  (My own bride's "Ranger".)

*

That original song from the summer of '60, posed a problem unresolved for many years.  The response-song resolves it, tying the knot.  Yet how so?

In the case of another song noticed recently in this space (“I Wanna Be Evil”, by Eartha Kitt), the problem dissolved upon re-hearing; the pussy-cat turns out to have been a paper tiger.  But in this other case  the problem only grows, the more you live, the more you know.  At times, it becomes acute. 
            We exchange vows when young, not knowing how to live up to them, barely understanding them perhaps.  We have never encountered such sickness, or such poverty, as we may later meet.  Maybe we make it, or maybe we break them.  Yet in time, Grace granting, we swear new vows, and these with open eyes:  vows to Fidelity itself; whereof our own best acts – be they in marriage, or on the field of battle, or in some sickroom  aside from sight --  are but a terrestrial reflection – -- a sort of dual, if you will.
(And Fidelity is just the Latin word for Faith.)


"The Lord be with you."   --  "And also with you."

© David Justice, 2009

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

La pornographie intellectuelle

Etant donné qu’il n’y a pratiquement plus d’intellectuels aux Etats-Unis, au sens sociologique et historique du terme -- nous avons bien plein de professeurs et de savants/ingénieurs, par contre -- tandis qu’aux pays de la francophonie, on comprend cela très bien, ce n’est pas la peine de diriger nos lecteurs anglophones (encore moins les monolingues) sur la dernière émission du signalé audiofeuilletoniste franco-maghrebi-néerlandais Fouad Laroui, au sujet de la trahison des clercs:  bien que nous ayons  souvent ici, pour eux, discuté de la fausse-haute vulgarisation dans des aires plus restreintes -- “physics porn”, “philosophy porn”, “neuroscience porn”, &c.    Or  notre camerade des ondes hertziennes virtuelles  nous offre une appréciation sévère de ceux qui, ayant publié tel entrefilet au Monde, ou certaine plaquette de poèmes, s’étendent sur les grands problèmes techniques de notre planète,  à coups de “Y’a que….”  (Chez nous, en panne d’intellectuels, ce sont les stars de Hollywood qui s’adressent à ces besoins.)

Donc, écoutez, réfléchissez:

L'intellectuel


*
Pour d’autres friandises
de la confiserie 
du docteur Justice,
consultez:


[Update 15 January 2012]
Jemand ist eben jetzt in dieser Weise hierher gekommen:
        porno fuer intellectuelle
Sie irren sich, mein Herr!

In other words, someone googled a German phrase meaning “pornography for intellectuels” (by morphological accident, the feminine singular adjective in French is a homograph of the plural noun in German), thus misunderstanding the semantics of the title of this post.
So, a lexical clarification for our foreign visitors:
Beginning some decades ago, the term “sexy” in academic/public-policy contexts came to refer to disciplines and research areas that were attracting young talent and getting grants.   The term quickly lost any connotations of actual sex.
Less widespread, though extant, and frequent on this site, is the use of the term “pornography” to denote tawdry populist exploitations of serious subjects in the middlebrow media.   As this site has no interest whatsoever in pornography in its literal sense (other than to advise:  Avoid it; marry, and be faithful to your spouse), the term is here always used in this sense of intellectual and social criticism.

Advanced Robotics


[Please!  This post is intended for the Asperger’s community only.]


Your assignment:
   (1) Tap Tap Tap with your left-left hand,
   THIS time THAT time T’OTHER time, yah.
   (2)  Prove Goldbach Conjecture.

Kthxbai.
 

~     ~     ~
[Update 30 Nov 2011]
Good news from our metallic chums:


Tuesday, October 18, 2011

A Musicological Introduction to Number Theory

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MobpPTVobOk

Student exercise for this chapter:
=>  Prove, or disprove, the Riemann Hypothesis.
(You will be graded primarily on your handwriting)

Philosophico-Philological Commentary on Monostich XXIX




.

.


.

.