Distinguishing discontinuous state-reduction (which he dubs R) -- i.e., the “collapse of the wave-function” upon
“observation” -- from linear evolution as per the
Schrödinger equation, a mathematician remarks:
I do not mean to imply that the
experimenter deliberately sets up a ‘measurement’ to achieve this. … Nature herself is continually
enacting R-process effects, without any deliberate intentions on
the part of an experimenter or any intervention by a ‘conscious observer’.
-- Roger Penrose, The Road to Reality (2004), p.
593
Thus achieving the esse
of percipi ‘naturally’ (vacuously).
[For the full post to which the above is a footnote, click here:
[For the full post to which the above is a footnote, click here:
http://worldofdrjustice.blogspot.com/2013/09/esse-est-percipi-redivivus-ter.html ]
Note:
D’Abro (in The Rise of the New Physics (1939)) writes
less dramatically of an act of measurement against a
given parameter as triggering “instantaneous
condensation” from the previous
diffuse cloud of potential values.
In Are Universes Thicker than Blackberries? (2003),
p. 4, Martin Gardner, a staunch foe of Science Porn, gives an even less
catastrophic-sounding synonym of “collapse of the wave-function”: rotation
of the state vector. He
goes on to polemicize (very readably) against the Many Worlds Interpretation,
ultimately concluding that “As far as we can tell, universes are not as
plentiful as even two blackberries.”
No comments:
Post a Comment