The latest catchphrase from the “trigger-warnings”
crowd is: “cultural appropriation.” Snowflakes are melting in the
heat of the phrase.
The current epicenter of this kerfuffle is Canada. Since Canada doesn't get to be the epicenter of all that much, we'll put the maple-leaf links front & center:
The current epicenter of this kerfuffle is Canada. Since Canada doesn't get to be the epicenter of all that much, we'll put the maple-leaf links front & center:
http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/jonathan-kay-cultural-appropriation-should-be-debated-too-bad-canadas-writers-union-instead-chose-to-debase-itself
http://www.newsweek.com/cultural-appropriation-outcry-succeeds-cancelling-gallery-show-white-painter-594924
Additionally:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-lefts-misguided-obsession-with-cultural-appropriation/2017/05/12/59e518bc-3672-11e7-b4ee-434b6d506b37_story.html?utm_term=.f04e49efef68
Take an example: Logically, if an author is male, there
could be no female characters in his book. He couldn't possibly present their inner truth -- and if he did, it would be even worse: appropriation.
Quickly running the classics through the mind, the only novel
that passes the test is Moby Dick.
All others, by male authors, must be burned.
It's okay -- a male whale |
For more about our lovable subaqueous sea-chum, try these
[Update] This just in: PETA has demanded the censorship of Moby Dick.
HarperCollins is preparing a new P.C. edition, minus the
whale.
(/ satire. Not
worth analyzing. We have not to
get down in the sandbox with the bisounours,
to wrangle over such notions. As
Hegel (or someone) once wittily put it:
“When you hear the terms ‘safe space’ or ‘appropriation’ -- entsichern Sie ihren Glock.”)
~
A generation ago, a somewhat related notion was that of coöptation. The
Establishment (that was the “They”, back Then) would dangle a carrot; and if
you took it, you’d been co-opted.
~
Although lists of huffy demands by aggrieved poetical
Eskimos have little resonance
outside a certain milieu, there is a deeper and much more general issue hiding
behind it, one discussed over the
decades under such rubrics as “The
Uses of the Past”.
An especially subtle one is offered by the historian Tony
Judt, in his wide-ranging pre-post-mortem exposition Thinking the Twentieth
Century. Here he refers to the “misappropriation” of the Holocaust
narrative, by a motley assortment of factions.
~
Related vocabulary:
Film critic Anthony Lane, recalling Dustin Hoffman in “Tootsie”:
… Hoffman playing an actor playing
an actress. That isn’t mimicry, it’s an identity heist.
-- “Folies à deux”, in The New
Yorker, 1 June 2020, p. 71
No comments:
Post a Comment