Sunday, February 18, 2018

What did you do in the Linguistics Wars, Daddy?

Awhile back I offered an essay in Mathematical Lexicography:


It led off with this:


    First, a sociological/tautological non-definition:

  What is mathematics?  One proposal, made in desperation, is ‘what mathematicians do’.
  -- -- Ian Stewart,  How to Cut a Cake (2006), p. 27


That stab in fact fails to offer even the virtue of a tautology, since it isn’t even true, without the further qualification that it is what mathematicians do… when they are doing mathematics.  -- If you’d tried similarly, without qualification,  to define linguistics based simply on the activities of linguists (ex officio: faculty and students in the Linguistics Department) at Berkeley during the years I was there, you would conclude that the field consisted of:  fixing your Volkswagens[**];  eating Chinese food;  and dabbling in neighboring fields like psychology and philosophy (later all these fields hopped into the hot-tub together and were newly baptised as Cognitive Science) -- all this while studiously ignoring most of the work done in the previous centuries of philology and language-sciences.

[**]  Sprawling supine beneath one's VW Beetle or Bus  was known locally as the "Berkeley lotus position".


[Note:  The title of this post  alludes to an insightful, delightful sociohistory of the era,
Randy Allen Harris, The Linguistics Wars (1993)]



[For further reflections on Berkeleyana, click here.

For the place of linguistics among the sciences, here.

For sociohistorical reflections on other sciences, here.]

2 comments:

  1. Thank you! is the constant quest to reinvent the wheel unique to linguistics?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yup, this definitely sounds like my time in the Linguistics Dept. at UMass.

    And yet, from a lexicographical perspective, "what mathematicians/linguists do when they are at work" are reasonable enough definitions.

    ReplyDelete