Sunday, May 11, 2014

A Meditation for Mother’s Day

[From a letter to my Mother in the old-folks home.]

~     ~     ~


The other day -- a sunny one, stirred by the merest of breezes -- a friend and I sat on a low wall  conversing (much like Pooh and Piglet in similar circumstances), in a shady spot of the University of Maryland campus, where I now work part-time, in addition to my regular job.  He remarked, à propos of nothing (for there was really nothing much to be à-propos of, save the drifting clouds and the dreaming birds, neither of which had anywhere they had to be, in any sort of haste or hurry) that his wife has an absolute horror of snakes.   Simply cannot abide ‘em.

Now, snakes (I mused aloud), I can take them or leave them, just as you please;  but one creature that many people shrink from, but which I positively enjoy, is spiders.   These have held an especial fascination  ever since I read a detailed account of their constructional capacities (webs of various sorts and shapes, according to species, but other contraptions as well) in a book by the science writer Richard Dawkins.  Whenever I spy a spider, I seem to behold a busy little engineer, and am always careful not to disturb his handiwork (or leg-i-work), even to the extent of, if needs be, ducking-under  to go out to the back deck, or refraining from emptying the leaf-barrel, whenever its brim has been spanned with a weft of his recent weaving.
(There is always something new and wondrous in the world of spiders.  Last week they reported a new kind of locomotion in one desert species:  It can do a kind of forward back-flip (if that is the term I want) as it scurries along, whether to relieve its little eight feet from the burning sands, or from sheer high spirits, was unclear.  He can also do a string of them in succession, so that he rolls along like a tumbleweed.)

Yet afterwards, as I drove home, it occurred to me that my fondness for God’s wee octopods  goes back much farther, earlier than Dawkins or even than learning to read:  back to Oak Ridge, by our little white house with its proper white downspout, one sunny day still glistening with a late rain, as you taught me a little rhyme, on a bouncy wee tune, that lives in memory yet (though that was long ago, the day you taught it to me, Truman probably still in office if I reckon correctly, and any number of things not yet invented), and which has been handed down through mothers and grandmothers and great-great-grandmothers through immemorial time, almost back to the first day of Creation.   It goes (in the version you taught me, which is still my favorite;  other variants exist):

            Oh the inky-dinky spider ♪ went up the water spout.
            Down came the rain, ♫ and washed the spider out.
            Out came the sun, ♪ and dried up all the rain,
            and the inky-dinky spider ♫ went up the spout again.

You taught me the hand-gestures that go with it:  downrippling fingers to figure the raindrops sliding down the spout, broadspreading arms to evoke the return of the smiling sun:  but best of all, an intricate, digital concatenation, thumb to finger and finger to thumb (with an asymmetry easier to show than to describe in words), then pivoting on the one link, swiveling upwards a rung, now this way now that (it’s quite difficult even to imagine, unless you are watching yourself do it), in a way that is quite counter-intuitive until you get the hang of it:  all of which represents, or is meant to suggest, the patient slow small steps of our diminutive eight-legged friend, Mister Spider -- whose actual motions, indeed, must exceed in complexity anything or brains can picture or fingers depict -- as he climbs the spout, and then, washed-down, re-climbs it, nothing daunted, as many times as it takes.  This was, in fact, the most complicated physical movement I had ever learned as of that date, rivaling that of tying one’s shoe (a task I had not yet mastered), and scarcely to be exceeded in after-years, until the dos-ee-dos and allemand-left of square-dancing.

~

Well, Mother, such is the gift you gave me that day, so long ago;  and which, in the absence of grandchildren of my own, I  from time to time  pass on  to such of the wondering toddlers of our cul-de-sac  as care to gather round and learn the old lore.   For there will ever and anew be fresh children, and that inky, dinky spider  will never cease climbing his spout.

Methods of Truth-functional Semantics


Some of us lead lives;  others go to graduate school.  Those who follow the latter path, eventually are possessed of such wisdom as this:

“A proposition is a function   from possible-worlds  to truth-values.”

We illustrate this insight with a simple case:

Snow-bunnies run faster and faster
and faster
and faster
and fasterandfasterandfasterandfasterand
faster than fast.

In the Snow-World, that proposition is as true as petunias;  as blue as cool pools;  as deep as the depths of thine eyes.

Saturday, May 10, 2014

“Dylan Mystery Album”


For several years, mostly while I was in college, the most precious dream-theme was the “Dylan Mystery Album”:  in sleep, I would imagine some unreleased Dylan song, which would come as an ineffable revelation.  This motif was triggered, of course, by the “basement tapes” and various other pirated releases.  The closest actual item to these oneiric imaginings, was “Please, Crawl out your Window”, which is sufficiently strange even when completely awake.

Later, his career went on and on, evolving in a direction that no longer interested me, his springy voice gone.  He released album after album, most of which I never listened to.

But as the years go by, ever new material is released, including from that golden early period, which he later churlishly repudiated,  but which lives on as a nonpareil, for those of my generational cohort.  Such is the age we live in:  Nothing remains buried; everything gets posted on YouTube.  I fully expect  sometime soon  to witness the actual “I come not to praise Caesar, but to bury him” speech, by Brutus, in the original Latin, recorded on-site at the time.

Anyhow -- Just stumbled on a bunch from the year of our Lord nineteen sixty-two -- when I was only twelve, and quite unaware of Dylan (nor could I have fathomed him then, had  by some chance  I heard).

Try this.
This is why we love the guy.

“Standing on the Highway”  (Not previously heard.)

“Fixing to Die”.


A version of this was on his first commerically released album:  and that performance was vastly more powerful:  distilled, as it were, and concentrated, from innumerable previous performances  that most of us never heard.   This earlier version  thus constitutes a contribution to lyrical aetiology.
(Additionally, this version includes a verse  not included on the Columbia album.) 



(I’m stealin’ -- I’m stealin’ -- pretty mama doncha tell on me:
 I’m stealin’ back  to my   old-time  used-to-be …)


~

Oh my!  Just learned this:

On youtube it’s stupidly hard to find Bob Dylan songs, especially with all those cover version trying to catch you out. Turns out that in order to prevent Bob Dylan videos from being taken down, a few crafty buggers have been uploading his songs with one of his earlier stage names – ‘Elston Gunn’. I don’t know if this should count as a meme, but there seem to be an endless amount of videos with ‘Elston Gunn’ instead of ‘Bob Dylan’.

As witness (“Percy’s Song”):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTZBeA139Rw

And (kind of terrible, actually) a guitarless version of "Positively 4th St.":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUA2Fod7nHc

With guitars this time, but even worse;  late Dylan:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzBJ0362g4E


"It Ain't Me Babe".
Not as good as the soulful album version, but FWIW:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_sc9n5tX0w

OK ... Let's give some credit to the guys in suits, at corporate Columbia,
who selected from among (evidently) many possibilities,
such as should be consecrated to History,
on the albums.
By and large, they chose well.

~

"Desolation Row".
OTOH ...  I like the tempo on this *much more* (and the delivery as well, upon mature consideration) than the album version:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yicGKHTOSKU
Nonetheless, it must be said, that this version is somehow 'posterior'.   It is most effective  for those of us who already (long ago) heard the original version, and memorized the lyrics (which are a bit less distinct here).  Also, additional harmonica work.  (Not especially memorable; but we savor His harmonica  as we recall each ... [redacted].)

For a Norwegian version of this classic song, click here:
http://worldofdrjustice.blogspot.com/2014/06/desolation-row-norwegian-version.html


"Visions of Johanna".
Neither better nor worse than the "Blonde on Blonde" published version,
but personally I prefer it,
simply because I, too often, took in the official recording,
while smoking,
and self-pitying ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwM_VH8H4c0

Yipes! Another that's even better ... Amazing ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxH3ObIAr8o
Srsly ... I need to retire ... and take up smoking ...

Oh Lord!  1961 no less.



[Zip to the very end of this, for a wonderful parable about East Orange, New Jersey.]



Dreams are a cheat.  I would awake from a “Mystery Album” episode, shaken, trembling and cherishing it:  but the lyrics and music had quite melted by morning.  And as for the deep inner Meaning … It had the feel of an epiphany, but the epiphany was empty.  It was like the ineffable insights of the stoned, which, upon resipiscence, if recalled at all, are revealed as silly and shabby.
Whereas these can be savored in complete lucidity.

My earliest memory (if it be real) is of climbing out of my crib, and plopping onto the floor.   One of these days (before I die), a video of the event  will appear on YouTube.
One can only conclude  to the imminence of The Rapture.

~

Quite an interesting concept, really, this "Elston Gunn".  Self-concealing, much like the "Traveling Wilburys".
We have, then:
Real name:  Robert Zimmerman.
Stage name (exoteric):  Bob Dylan.
Conundrum-inside-an-enigma name (esoteric):  Elston Gunn.
But for the real cognoscenti -- what?  Yet another level down ...


Have Theory, Will Travel


In his peripatetic scamper through the capitals of world philosophy, in a valiant search for something illuminating to say about, literally, Nothing (“Why is there something rather than nothing,” is the topic of the book), the philosophically-trained science journalist Jim Holt arranges to go interview Derek Parfit.  Yet, though the reporter must travel all the way to England to do this, Parfit imposes a restriction on the interview  which no newsman should be subjected to, and which even Ben Ladin did not have the chutzpah to demand:

He added that, since he was very slow in formulating his thoughts, he would prefer not to be quoted verbatim.  Instead, he would try to answer any questions I had about his written work  with a “yes” or “no” or some other brief response.
-- Jim Holt, Why does the World Exist? (2012), p. 223


(Sounds like a Turing Test.)   And this, note, for an interview broadcast live, where indeed the pressure of maintaining a snappy airtime  often trivializes discussion, and where the subject is his own work, which he has had a lifetime to think about, and approached by a deferential amateur in an attitude of near-reverence.

Accordingly, nothing of interest stems from the empty exercise of the interview itself;  undaunted, our author tricks out his report with quotations from Parfit’s previously published writings (something he could have done from home).   We are reminded of Edmund Morris’s desperate expedient, in his abortion of a biography of Ronald Reagan, where, confronted by the blank mind and depthless shallows of his subject, he filled things in with the imaginings of fiction.

For more on the old fraud, click here:

      Derek Parfit, Man of Mystery

 For the inspiration of the title:  
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tgvxu8QY01s



Monday, May 5, 2014

Update to the “Lost Fragment”


It has come to our attention that certain unsavory elements, as deficient in judgment as in personal hygiene, have dared cast aspersions upon the otherwise universally acknowledged authenticity of the “Lost Fragment of ‘Our Mutual Friend’”,  which it was our good fortune to have had the privilege of revealing  to an expectant world.  Certain so-called “graphological experts” -- well, we shall not weary you with the details.

In trenchant refutation of all such criticasters, herewith attested samples of (on the left) an undoubted Dickensian manuscript;  and, on the right, that of the fragment in question, which came into our possession (d’une manière  un tant soit peut  rocambolesque)  in one of the back-streets of Geneva:

No sane man could doubt  that these are from the same hand

.

Perennial Questions, cheerfully disposed of


Q:  Why is there Something, rather than Nothing?
A:  Just Because.

Q:  Was will das Weib?!?
A:  Ein Phallus-kind.

Q:  Que sais-je?
A:  "Je sais tout."
Q:  Où suis-je?
A:  “Je suis partout.”
Q:  Qui suis-je?
A: “Je suis qui je suis.”
 


Pour nos essais
en langue
la plus châtiée qui soit,
checkez-out   …..



Sunday, May 4, 2014

Phrase of the day: “Euro-Tartuffe”


Time was, in this country, and around the world, when idealists used to dream of an End to All Wars -- to be enforced (a necessary codicil, though not spoken so loud) by a One World Government.   Americans were among those in the forefront of this, signally Woodrow Wilson, who garnered a Nobel Peace Prize for his advocacy of the League of Nations (la SDN), the first step towards such a new order, established as the dust was settling from the Great War.   But when push came to shove, Senate Republicans and prairie populists  would have none of it, and Wilson’s brainchild was a prophecy unhonored in its own country.

The ethos of that time  is now impossible to re-experience, though students of history may imagine it.   The Release 2.0 of the League, the United Nations, is mostly a debating shop, for harangues that few heed.   Not a bad thing;  good that it’s there;  but no shadow or echo of the original vision of One World Government (whose aftershadow lives on only in the nightmare imagination  of the prairie populists).

~

Europe, however, shaken to its foundations by the deeper trauma of the Second World War, which no-one ever imagined to dub “the Great”, and which turned out even worse than our fears, adopted a more regional version of the original vision, one which actually has some teeth to it:  what is now known as the European Union.   The average American has probably not even heard of the thing (indeed, I almost wrote “EEC” by anachronism), but it is very real.   And its existence has no doubt contributed to the one big spectacular fact of the past nigh-on seventy years, what must astonish any student of European history (which has been bloodier at every level, than the non-devotee has any idea):  unbroken peace among nations belonging to that Union.  An astonishment that grows with each passing year of No World War Three.  And if there have, in the course of those decades, been occasional instances of fussy Brusselian bureaucratic overreach -- in one actual, notorious case, regulation of the length and curvature of bananas -- this pales beside the Holocaust (to take one example, hm, at random).  

In time though, the freely adopted multiheaded yoke  has come increasingly to chafe certain individual withers;  and resistance to further EU encroachment has become a key issue in the upcoming pan-European elections:


In part, this swell of opposition comes as a result of actual EU overreach, such as the dismanteling of borders at a time of a great “inwash of the unwashed” (see essays here and here), in part because, from a more zeitgeistlich perspective, the diktats of Brussels have encouraged fresh overreach by, for example, the misandrists of Paris and Stockholm, who mean (and here I write hyperbolically, though only barely) to police and limit (with a ruler, of the sort once used by nuns to smack the palms of naughty boys) the length and curvature of erections.


[Update Memorial Day 2014;  from the NZZ:
Europa und die EU, das sind Klischees über Normen aller Art, etwa diejenige über die Krümmung der Gurke, die zwar längst nicht mehr gilt, aber an Stammtischen unvermindert als Beispiel einer fehlgeleiteten monströsen Bürokratie angeführt wird.

OK, so maybe it was cucumbers, not bananas.  Same idea.

Gurke mit Attitude


Anyhow, the people have spoken, in the Européennes, “un séisme europhobe”, avec percée du FN.]

~

~ Recommendation posthume ~
“Si j’étais encore en vie, et que je désirais un bon whodunnit,
que lirais-je?"
(Je suis le Président Wilson, et j’ai approuvé ce message)

~


Anyhow, all that is but by way of dilettante kibitzing;  I am not among those solons such as Thomas Friedman or George Will  who are licensed to pontificate  each Sunday, across from the editorial page.   I do, however, carry an official Linguist’s License, and am a paid-up member of the Global Sociophilological Association (QG:  Genève -- it is actually a subunit of the WDJ).   And hence am permitted to observe this new coinage, reported in this morning’s press:

L'écolo Durand s’en prend aux "Euro-tartuffes"
"Plus forts que les euro-sceptiques ou les euro-béats, voici venu le temps des euro-tartuffes", écrit-il. Soit, à en croire Durand, ceux qui tiennent un discours à Paris et un autre à Bruxelles.

Which, being Englished for the convenience of our obligate-anglophone friends, is no more than to say:  A prominent Green politician has coined a category to join the extant extremes of the Euro-sceptics (those who oppose further EU encroachment), and the euro-béats (difficult to translate exactly:  it refers to those bobo-bisounours, who embrace the Union and all its present and potential works, with a great big smoochy kiss):  the opportunist Euro-hypocrites (after Molière’s character Tartuffe), who, speaking alternately out of either side of the mouth spout one thing in Brussels  and another thing at home:  here to butter-up the goose, there to flatter the gander.

[ Updated here/ Mise à jour ici / Hier auf den neuesten Stand gebracht:]

Saturday, May 3, 2014

The Perils of Publishers


A story I showed around to friends having met a friendly reception, I sent it off to an appropriate publisher, whose name I shall not stain by mention, lest it join the rogues gallery of those  who rejected the manuscript of Harry Potter, back in the day.  The periodical was chosen, not at random, but as having been the one to spring upon an unsuspecting world  my first mystery story, the eponymous offering of the later collection I Don’t Do Divorce Cases, available at your local bookstore -- or rather, might be, if local bookstores any longer existed, which they do not;  still, you can find copies online at Amazon or Barnes & Noble, and at a price too nugatory to allude to.   And yet, like that base [ethnicity deleted], who threw away a pearl, greater than all his tribe (an incident recorded in the annals of our nation’s literature, somewhere), the editor -- at that particular juncture, on that particular day, the moon being in some unfavorable phase, and Mars having passed into the House of Detention -- did not choose to pick it up.  Whereupon the spurned offering, like some younger son packed off to the Colonies, shows up, uncloaked against the bitter winds, upon this very site, as though upon the doorstep  of an unfeeling world, to be gawked at by surfers and idlers:  and all for less than the price of a penny.
(“A Narrow Escape”:  vide infra.)

A typical publisher, in his lair


~

These dark events have prompted me to reveal the following vignettes, fruit of my similar experience the last time I attempted to venture  where angels fear to tread.  (The period covers my time in Princeton, an epoch you might have an opportunity of reading about, should ever my current publisher, asleep at the switch or possibly kidnapped by pirates, or spirited away by faeries, come out with the collection Princeton Follies  as long ago promised!)

Appropriate beverage to accompany this narrative:  
            Fifty-year-old port.
Consonant soundtrack: 
            Something tenebrous for the chamber,  with plenty of cello.

~       ~       ~

ANNALS OF THE UNPUBLISHED

A stifling day in August.  The editor is having her periodic indisposition.  Over the transom my manuscript comes.

*

The publisher stops by the office of the tweed-clad editor; coughs, hesitates; he hates to say it  but… "…the pressure of investors.  And that comes down to circulation.  Now unfortunately, no-name material, however we-would-both-agree worthy, -- does  not  sell. So…"
The editor bites his lip and nods.  With determination he reaches into the slush pile.  Ha!  Something-or-other by some nobody  named “Justice”.  Discard without reading.

*

"Well there's only room for one of them, and this Princeton fellow shows real promise.  Your cousin's stuff is glittery, but shallow -- no staying power."
Casting about for a comeback and finding none, she abandons debate; then relaxes, as a cool smile forms upon her face.
"Pretty funny, coming from someone whose contract is about to be renewed – by my uncle."
"I—By-- ?  Well yes, I take your point.  Style, substance, all that, your cousin's got it, or may someday; let's go with it."

*

He shakes his head from side to side.  This is good, dammit, this is good, and from – what is his name?  from Princeton?
Enthralled, he scarcely notices  as the mother ship hovers outside the window of his fifty-seventh-floor office.  A beam enters slowly, completely silent.
Later, the office is empty.  The incident is never explained.

*

Syphilis: the Silent Killer

            In a shed in Tijuana, a sordid night of bought amours.   The man leaves behind a couple of silver dollars, takes with him something he hadn't bargained for.
            Years later, with another, a child is born.  The boy seems healthy, becomes an editor, moves to New York.
            That morning, a manuscript from an unknown author, from – New Jersey, of all places.  Yet he reads with growing interest.   A realization dawns.  He puts the manuscript down slowly, as he gazes at the framed portrait of Maxwell Perkins on his wall.  Their eyes seem to meet.

            He presses the buzzer.  "Miss Anscombe?  Something extraordinary…"
            The sound of a scraping chair from the outer office.
            Yet at that moment the spirochaete, having lain  long undetected, while having silently multiplied many times, obeys its bioprogram  and unleashes the full fury of its corruption.  Intelligence, morals --  nothing is spared.
            -- "Yes, Mr. --?"
            "Huh?  Um, -- oh,  -- Mother, the sun! give me the sun! ---  Ahhh… --  whyncha call up Bret Easton Ellis, see if he has anything left moldering at the bottom of his drawer."