Showing posts with label das Ewig-Weibliche. Show all posts
Showing posts with label das Ewig-Weibliche. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Völkerlieder … komm’ mal wieder

 

Des voix depuis l’Allemagne profonde.

Und ich, vielenorts daheim,

send echoes  of each kind.

 

 

Die Gedanken sind frei

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNTVachAmNc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tM9AvEWgwfI&t=144s

 

Frei sind die Gedanken;

zwar so, wie Sie meinen.

Aber Ach --  die Gefühle!

Man erliegt wohl den seinen.

 

Die Gedanken sind frei;

ich denk’ an dich immer.

Mein Herz bricht entzwei

hör’ ich deine Stimme.

 

Sei es Hirn, sei es Herz,

sei es Ernst, sei es Scherz --

Die Wahrheit liegt da:

au coeur   ses raisons,

que Raison ne connaît pas.

 

*

 

Wenn ich ein Vöglein wär

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9AGBOFQYnE

 

Wenn du ein Vöglein wärest

flög ich zu dir,  my dearest --

could   I    but     fly !

Möcht’ ich so gerne,

bleibst doch in Ferne --

so far, so high ….

 

Yet, here  within  my  breast

hast  thou, O bird,  thy nest --

sanft, warm, und rein.

Far,  and yet  near   to   me,

here  may I cherish thee --

so   bist   du   mein.

 

*

 

Es zogen einst fünf wilde Schwäne

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MH3MbuCL5xY


Thy very voice   evokes   wild swans,

winging their way to westward.

 

At the final crescendo, it soars,

skywards,

till   ‘tis out  of sight …

 

Monday, October 27, 2025

Fleetwood Nation

 

One of the finest passages in musical history, includes lyrics as follows:

 

            Dom dom, dom do dom, ooby do,

            Dom dom, dom do dom, ooby do,

                        (da capo  al fine del mondo)

 

The lead singer -- a guy named Gary, it turns out -- begins in a style that, in refined circles, is denominated "a capella" (from the Latin; literally, "in chapel style"), but which, in the doo-wop era, was known simply as "singing".  How it all came about:  This guy Gary (we learn from Wikipedia, which knows all) was waiting with this other bobby-soxer at a bus-stop, see, and they got to singing, and it was pretty neat, and so the girl, she had this friend, and so the three of them sang at school, and all the kids liked it, so they "formed a group" -- a process as simple then  as forming a collection out of a, b, and c, in set theory.  The group was called "Two Girls and a Guy", which really said it all.  Originally they were purely a-capella; later they added a rhythm section, consisting entirely of Gary's car-keys.

 

Then later, when they started to get famous, some manager changed their name to "The Fleetwoods", which is still a pretty neat name.  (Notice I do not say, "a cool name"; that would be beatnik.)  But they never forgot their roots -- in fact, the "Fleetwoods" were not so dubbed after the Cadillac of that description, but after their own telephone exchange (as in "Fleet-wood Four Five Seven Oh Nine").

 

The masterpiece referenced above was -- well, obviously, you had to be there, there and then.  The then and the there was American suburbia in 1959.   Back then I was even younger and even more completely clueless than in 1961, anno "Please Help Me I'm Falling" (**).  The Fleetwoods TOOK THE AIRWAVES BY STORM (to use a phrase  echoic of the late conflict, by then safely forgotten)  with a hit song called "Come Softly to Me".  Originally, at the sock hop in their high school gym, the song had been called, with better brevity, "Come Softly", but (again, Wikipedia) that same publicity-savvy manager made them change it, on the grounds that the original was... too... something called....  "risqué". (??!! Wh-wh-*what* ???????)  Anyway, it's a neat song, and if you listen to it, and tell your friends, they'll think it's really neat too.

 

*

 

You might gather from the above  that I am slighting this song;  if so, you gather amiss.  It was actually a major stepping-stone in my (thitherto minimal) musical education.

 

The poverty of our musical upbringing, on our little cul-de-sac  there in the suburbs, was astonishing.  If it were somehow translated into imagery, you would see a huddle of stricken children, wearing nothing but Keds, ribs showing, bellies distended, with the International Red Cross shaking their heads in the background, giving up the case as hopeless.  Later on, some kids had to take piano lessons, but I never did, and any music I was exposed to  came out of a little plastic slab, of the size, and essentially the function, of a cigarette pack. 

 

The song actually confused me, and I didn't like it at first.  But since it was NUMBER ONE, everyone wound up hearing it several dozen times a day.   It was almost my first introduction to multi-part singing -- songs like "The Little White Duck", till then the principle fare, tended to monody -- and my very first introduction to stretto -- the voices easing in and easing out, delicately overlapping like waves breaking softly upon waves.  And like, what was it up to?  It wasn't funny, like "Purple People Eater" or "The Chipmunk Song"; it didn't tell a story, like "The Ballad of Davy Crockett" or "Kisses Sweeter than Wine"; it didn't bounce up and down, like "At the Hop"; and it didn't have a simple "Hickory Dickory Dock" sort of tune, like "Rock Around the Clock".  And it certainly wasn't guy fare, like "Hound Dog". It was, you might say, kind of -- girly.

 

*

 

So once again I made the pilgrimage to Youtube.  And once again, learned something new and richly evocative, even though, again, I had remembered that song perfectly, note for note, for all those years.

 

Firstly, it turns out that Top 40 on a dirtcheap AM transistor radio (or, in the previous couple of years, off a little plastic crystal set that my dad put together from a kit, and that only got one channel) does not provide the full depth of musicality that one may derive  from either live performance  or some assemblage of digitized woofers and tweeters.  This little thin sound trickled out; and if the song had a good beat, you could hear the beat part, and sometimes make out some of the words.  The highest praise for a song was, "It has a good beat and you can dance to it"; only I couldn't dance to it, being shy and only nine years old.  As for "Come Softly", it wasn't clear how even teenagers could dance to it.  It wasn't jitterbug, but neither was it the sort of simple Slow Dance such as -- much, much later, when I was all of twelve -- we would dance to at Canteen, at the junior high, in gingerly contact with an individual of the opposite and complementary (and wholly unimaginable) gender,  simply rocking slowly from foot to foot until the music was over.  It was -- not syncopated exactly, more like... you couldn't put your finger on it.  It seems to have been scored for naiads.

 

Hearing it now, though only on the speakers of my PC, I realize that the kid Gary had a voice for which the cherubs sighed,  chins propped on hands as they listened, eyes shut, over the clouds.  The song opens a capella, and you can hear why:  What accompaniment could possibly improve upon his voice?

 

Secondly,  learning the concrete matter-of-fact details  brings you up short.  Simply to learn that the trio is from an actual place (in the event, the state of Washington) is like a wake-up splash of water.  I don't know where I imagined singers came from, back then -- "from Hollywood" or "from Broadway", maybe.  But these three are from Olympia, not Olympus.  And they have just regular names, like other kids -- "Gary", not something made up, like "Elvis" or "Dion".  In fact their lead singer, whom I would have pictured, had I tried (though I did not, not being a girl), as a cross between Lord Byron and Apollo, turns out to look like somebody's kid brother (and his sidekicks might almost be his mother).  He has what I now recognize as a “bedroom voice”; but his babyface says rather, Tuck me in.  He looks like he just stepped out of a soda shop.

 

*

 

It suddenly occurs to me that soda shops no longer exist.  The younger among you can probably scarcely conceive what such a thing would even be -- the product-line seems strangely impoverished; as who should say, a "water shop", or a "bicarbonate of soda store". Yet for a teen in the years before the Great War, and then after the Great War, and then during the Big One that they had to give a number to, and then right on in through the 'forties and 'fifties, these constituted the principle cultural and anthropological institutions of the land.

 

No, I'm not being nostalgic. It was a time before either Google or Wikipedia, so that life was worth living only in a narrowly restricted and relative sense.  Still, its pop songs are even better than I'd remembered.

 

========

(**) Note: For “Please Help Me I’m Falling”, see:

 

https://worldofdrjustice.blogspot.com/2011/10/duet-at-distance.html

 

Tuesday, February 25, 2020

Measure for Measure


Isabella, the ice-queen, a meet match for Angelo, who micturates in snowmelt.   He is perched upon the mount of his incorruptibility;  she, on that of her virginity.  Her approach to him, for clemency for her brother, is stiff and formal, till she heeds the counsel of her crouching Cyrano, who advises her to turn on the waterworks, and maybe show a bit of bodice.   Yet it is her very purity-armor that attracts Angelo to a fall, where strumpets had no such power.   (I am familiar with such paradoxical infatuations.)

As for the duke, he is more of a trickster-figure, a trifler with men’s fates, than an image of the Good King Haroun-al-Rashid  toddling about the night-streets of his capital  incognito.  In a formal sense, he could be called the hero of the play, and Isabella the heroine.  God preserve us from such heroes.

Thursday, August 22, 2019

Wardrobe Malfunction


Wardrobe Malfunction,
Then and Now


With a waist and with a side
White as Hebe's, when her zone
Slipt its golden clasp, and down
Fell her kirtle to her feet,
While she held the goblet sweet
And Jove grew languid.

-- Keats

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/Lille_carolus_duran.JPG

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Elevator Encounter

(A milling mass, like a dust-storm, or a London fog, in the foyer.  As Times Square or Grand Central is quasi the cosmos in miniature, so might this little scene  be a model, in miniature, of Times Square.)

(A green delta lights up and dings;  beneath that, the doors depart, revealing a pristine lit parallelepiped, its interior  for the moment  devoid of life -- like a bandbox, but obliging. 
From out the foggy massing figures, two  independently  congeal, and enter that inviting space, which seemingly, like the gate in "Vor dem Gesetz", has opened precisely for them: a young woman, who has entered first, and a man, who enters after.  Upright, they come to rest.  Behind them, silently, the doors slide shut.)

For a time -- brief as the clock ticks it, yet deep by the mind -- no word is spoken, as either gaze ranges randomly, rather over head-height, idly picking out and imagining spots in the featureless beige (was it), flat plastic paneling, as though prepared to read any public signage there might be;  things like, “No Parking”; “Non sporgersi”; or “Post No Bills”.  In absence of any such, their gazes drifted, lightly, noncommitally lower, as though by the mere action of impersonal gravity;  until, by merest chance of so limited a geometry (had the two been but dots in a many-dimensional Calabi-Yau manifold, their gazes need never have crossed), they alit, upon each other.

“Mm-m.. Rather dreadful weather we’ve been having,” remarked the gentleman, truthfully enough, anent what the meteorologists had described, judiciously, as a “wintry mix”.  Yet said it, with a touch of emphasis only slimly supported by the banality of the observation;  so that a percipient semiotician, had any been present (invisibly, in the air) might have concluded that the manner here exceeded the matter in import.
And indeed, the young gentlewoman might well herself have been versed in the semio-interpretive arts:  for did not then, for an instant (no more), a touch of color mantle her cheek?  only to vanish, quick as the flicker of flame.

“Ahh… Come here often?” he ventured, soldiering on, though having received no explicit response to his first observation;  illustrating the vague ‘here’ with a faint and ineffectual gesturing towards the surrounding box, or possibly the containing building, voire the town,  voire  life on Earth.
At this, the damsel did reply.  “Only during this week of TDY; and today is my last day.”
Each now mum; each perhaps pondering this outwardly nugatory, yet ineffably  suggestive exchange.

Thus a profound silence now filled each several corner of the elevator, as it slowly, relentlessly, rose, towards, and finally beyond, another floor.  The only motion at all  was that of the elevator itself:  which, moving smoothly uniformly through Euclidean space, in accordance with Galilean Relativity, was not perceptible to the occupants in terms of applicable physics (and yet mayhap they do sense something, beyond the laws of kinetics:  as when the sleeper in the berth, on a night-train, somehow in dreams  tenses and senses when the conveyance enters the yet deeper darkness of a tunnel far beneath the Alps).

The third floor was reached; a light sprang on to that effect; and both he and both she  at once held their breaths;  and kept holding them, as the contraption eased to a stop, and the doors slid slowly open.  Was their twosome now to be adulterated?  Yet no-one got on;  and the doors, indifferent, slid shut again.

(Were this a murder-mystery, the burning question would now be:  What had happened to the presumable person on the third floor, who had pressed the summoning button?  Sudden heart-attack?  Kidnapped by a rival intel agency?  Taken up bodily to the Hereafter, in sudden Rapture?   Or snatched down to the Basement, by the Fiend? -- This not being a mystery story, we shall never know.)

Relaxing now, she smiled and said:  “False alarm.”
They both again fell silent, more comfortably -- we could almost say, companionably -- this time,  as the vertical chariot, as though drawn towards the zenith by some cosmic force, noiselessly effortlessly and ineluctably  rose to yet another floor:  and, this time unsummoned, breezed past it.

[Impatient, my experienced and worldly readers chafe:  What did he not say this, nor nodded she that?  -- But you were not there;  and the words we wished to say but never said, are like the small souls of infants who perished at birth;  and cannot be reclaimed, from their tiny unmarked graves.]

~

Again a lift, a lilt, as another floor is passed without isssue or incident -- passed-by, like opportunities;  passed over, like disinherited heirs.   He means to speak, but his lips are soundless.  She leans as though to gesture -- but stays her hand, sinking back like a river into its bed.
Meanwhile, unperceived, impassive, the world continues to turn.

At last, the lift arrives at the last floor but one (the last  his own):  the very floor she had selected, when first presented with a panel of enticing choices…
The lit cage eases to a stop.  The doors, as fatefully as the Red Sea, part -- yet almost as though with a butlerish bow, to allow the lady to step off.  With a hesitant step, she moves to leave;  half out, half-turns, and forms a word -- but then says nothing.  And yet, for a moment, stands still amid the doorway, as he suddenly hies his hand;  and then, alarmed, alight, cries out:

Ah, lady!  Companion
for but a brief step up the rising path.
What then of PEGASUS --
Pegasus, pining and pawing the ground?
What of Pegasus, the white-winged,
gold-girt steed ??
Whereon, upon what fodder
can he feed ????

Then over her shoulder, not unkindly, yet ever more faintly as she withdraws and disappears:

Upon grass, sir;
Upon God’s  green  grass.

The doors close for the final time  upon their remembered co-presence;  and the lift resumes for the home-stretch, with a shudder  and something of a sigh.  And never again in this life, did those two ever meet.

[And at that, the Recording Angel writes finis to the page, and turns  another leaf.]

Thursday, April 26, 2018

Women & Wisps



who, when
she danced,

left a stab of perfume    in the air,

like a white azalea

-- Daphne du Maurier, Rebecca  (1938)

~

the smoke of her cigarette   whirling back over her shoulder
like a sweet-smelling  scarf    in the wind

-- William Lindsay Gresham, Nightmare Alley (1946)


~

Mary Ann Weaver  on Benazir Bhutto in Rawalpindi:

She was an icon -- beautiful, imperial, aloof -- passing, almost dreamlike, through the dust and exhaust fumes.
-- Pakistan (2002), p. 172



Tuesday, March 13, 2018

More on “the Eternal Feminine”


(1)
Das Unbeschreibliche
hier ist getan.
Das Ewig-Weibliche
zieht uns hinan.
[-- Goethe, Faust]

A late-Elizabethan version:

Nó wórds fór it --
Yet ‘tis done.
A woman’s Forever
beckons us on.

[ -- Anon.  The “B” manuscript substitutes “Whatever” for “Forever”:
scholars are divided upon which is the valid reading.]



(2)

To the psychologist, the emotional differences between the sexes  appear small in a laboratory,  but enormous during a quarrel with his wife.
-- Theodor Reik, Of Love and Lust (1949/1957), p.412

Saturday, March 10, 2018

“Dottie’s Dimple” hemi-monostich




Dottie’s

dimple

twinkled


        [--Mary McCarthy, The Group (1963)]

Friday, March 17, 2017

Julian the Apostate multistich



“Do you think I would have minded  that?”
She turned  full on me,
and the  large  black  eyes       blazed
like obsidian
in the sun.

[--Gore Vidal, Julian (1964), p. 157]



Sunday, March 6, 2016

Hittila the Hun


(Another in our series of “Analogs and Anticipations” -- parallels from History.)

Both Hitler and Attila have so passed into proverb  as no longer to be generally perceived in their actual variety.   The name of “Hitler” is now just the conversation-stopper -- the argumentum ad Hitler, the Nazi-Keule, signalling that reasoned discussion is at an end.   Attila figures mostly in unanalytical snarky put-downs of ultra-conservatives -- “to the right of Attila the Hun”.  (I myself  stooped to such sport, in a satirical trifle,  Attila versus Trump.)

And yet the two figures of actual history, as opposed to the straw-filled bugbears  that are flourished for rhetorical purposes, do share a trait, quite apart from their extremism and violence.   Namely, a knack for diplomacy, and a keen eye for the geopolitical field of force.   That might surprise anyone who was lazily raised as I was in the primary schools of the ‘fifties, where we were taught that the little man with the funny moustache had been a “house-painter”, who had jumped-up beyond his proper station, and improbably become a dictator  quite unrelated to any qualities he might possess.  And yet more surprising in the case of Attila, who, with his Hun-horde, was typically depicted  (to the nodding pupils) as essentially a plague of locusts, without politics or policy or personal characteristics of any sort.

Consider, then, this:

The facility with which Attila had penetrated into the heart of Gaul  may be ascribed to his insidious policy  as well as to the terror of his arms.  His public declarations were skilfully mitigated by his private assurances;  he alternately soothed and threatened the Romans and the Goths;  and the courts of Ravenna and Toulouse, muturally suspicious of each other’s intentions, beheld with supine indifference  the approach of their common enemy.
-- Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire (1776-1788)

For Gaul and the Romans  substitute France and the French;  for the Goths, the English; for Ravenna et alia, the Slavic nations,  and you pretty much have a picture of European diplomacy in the 1930s.


~

There are other parallels;  these we mention, only because they run counter to the brainless-bulldog stereotypes of both men.  Gibbon, referring to the forces of Aëtius and Theodoric, writes:

On their approach, the king of the Huns  immediately raised the siege, and sounded a retreat  to recall the foremost of his troops  from the pillage of a city which they had already entered.   The valour of Attila was always guided by his prudence;  and as he foresaw the fatal consequences of a defeat in the heart of Gaul, he repassed the Seine, and expected the enemy in the plains of Châlons, where smooth and level surface was adapted to the operations of his Scythian cavalry.

Though never more than a corporal in the war, Hitler does seem to have possessed a sound military-political instinct at times, especially in the early stages of his career, before conquest went to his head.  William Shirer’s accounts repeatedly emphasize how Hitler had secretly been prepared to climb down (e.g. in the re-occupation of the Ruhr), had the French and the British called his bluff.   They did not;  he took their measure;  the rest is history.


~
[Auxiliary sub-footnote:
Gibbon likewise proceeds to adduce a surprising incident involving Attila and the princess  Honoria, which illustrates the Bluebeard motif  in feminine psychology.  We alluded to that briefly here.    The subject may well be beyond the depth of our plumb-line; and at any rate deserves, not a note, but a book.  And as that book may well already have been written -- possibly twelve-times over -- we here fall silent.]

Thursday, September 3, 2015

Kafka on gallantry


A bi-Abrahamic perspective, aus Mitteleuropa:

“Ich rate Ihnen, die Sache im guten  beizulegen.”
“Ich habe mir ja auch gedacht, daß es besser wäre.  Sie ist ja eine Frau.  Frauen haben keine Seele, sagt Mohamet mit Recht.  Zu verzeihen wäre auch menschlicher, goethischer.”
-- Franz Kafka, Tagebücher:  Aufzeichnungen aus dem Jahre 1912:  28 Februar



Leçon de grammaire:
      goethisch;   goethischer;    am goethischsten

Monday, May 5, 2014

Perennial Questions, cheerfully disposed of


Q:  Why is there Something, rather than Nothing?
A:  Just Because.

Q:  Was will das Weib?!?
A:  Ein Phallus-kind.

Q:  Que sais-je?
A:  "Je sais tout."
Q:  Où suis-je?
A:  “Je suis partout.”
Q:  Qui suis-je?
A: “Je suis qui je suis.”
 


Pour nos essais
en langue
la plus châtiée qui soit,
checkez-out   …..



Friday, March 21, 2014

Hör zu, Maria, zärtliche Vorschläge … (On Supplication)


Among my favorite lyric romantic passages in literature, is this, from Günther Grass Die Blechtrommel (1959):

"Hör' zu, Maria, zärtliche Vorschläge: Ich könnte mir einen Zirkel kaufen  und einen Kreis um uns schlagen,  könnt'  mit demselben Zirkel  die Neigungswinkel deines Halses messen, während du liest, nähst oder, wie jetzt, an meinem Kofferradio drehst. Lass doch das Radio, zärtliche Vorschläge:  Ich könnt' mir die Augen impfen lassen und wieder zu Tränen kommen. Beim nächsten Metzger ließe Oskar sein Herz durch den Wolf drehen, wenn du deine Seele gleichfalls. Wir könnten uns auch ein Stofftier kaufen, damit es still bleibt zwischen uns beiden. Wenn ich mich zu Würmern entschlösse und du zur Geduld: Wir könnten angeln gehen und glücklicher werden. Oder das Brausepulver von damals, erinnerst du dich? Du nennst mich Waldmeister, ich brause auf, du willst noch mehr, ich geb' dir den Rest - Maria, zärtliche Vorschläge. Warum drehst du am Radio, hörst nur noch aufs Radio, als besäße dich ein wildes Verlangen nach Sondermeldungen?"

I was reminded of this  by the following passage in the fine and undervalued novel by Arthur Koestler (who likewise  originally wrote in German), Arrival and Departure (1941):

“Don’t go, please,” he repeated.  “I’ll play you the gramophone.  I’ll make clever conversation.  I’ll give you iced wine for tea from the refrigerator.”
He looked up at her in hopeless devotion.

I too have toddled  a ways down this path,  in the finale to the story “Lost and Found” (available in the collection I Don’t Do Divorce Cases):

     She called, or he called her.  It was the final call.
     He confessed his failure.  She seemed not to take it hard.  She began to take her leave but suddenly he interrupted her, his voice taking on an unbearable urgency.
     "Lady lady, I'm not just a P.I. you know.  Not at all. I can serve. No no, please listen.  I can do other things for you.  Everything, anything.  Fix your car, do your taxes.  Grow your garden, wash your windows. Carry your bags, protect you from the sun, shield you from shadows.   Please, anything.  I can go on trips, run errands for you.  Please.  I can go to the market:  for eggs.  I can go to the store: for milk."
     He listened in silence, to the silence, crackling immensely across acres of empty space.  And then he heard the click as she hung up forever, and vanished vastly and forever from his unimagined life.

Miserere, Domina

Sunday, March 2, 2014

Rocking the Boat


She pushed away the plate of soup unfinished, and planted her elbows on the table.  Slipping her hands under the sleeves of her kimono, she began, lightly, delicately, with the tips of her fingers, to caress her own arms.   How smooth they were, how soft and warm, and how secret  under the sleeves.
-- Aldous Huxley, Antic Hay (1923)

Having an idle hour at my disposal,  I take the liberty, contre mon habitude, of jotting down a little note concerning an amusing interview -- an incident, merely, no more than that, nothing rising to the level of an Adventure or a Case -- at which my polygraphic friend and amanuensis  Doctor Watson did not assist,  so that, unless I write it up myself, it must be lost to history.

It was a sunny autumn day.  I was contentedly at work on my monograph, Über die Methoden und Entdeckung der weiblichen Onanie (privately printed), when Mrs Hudson, the housekeeper, announced a Miss Kitzler, and ushered her into my chambers.   She proved to be a pretty brunette of around twenty years of age, fashionably and tastefully dressed in pink and crème de camélia,  with bobbed hair, bright eyes, damask cheeks, and a well-turned ankle visible beneath her crinolines:  quite a palate-pleasing specimen, I assessed, were I subject to the attractions of such things.  But what most arrested the attention was her wearing, though the weather was not chilly,  a rich muff of silver fir, inside which her hands could be perceived to be slowly revolving.

“Il y a quelque-chose pour vous, là-dedans…”


She alighted on the seat indicated, and sat primly, her knees pressed together beneath her dress.  “I dreamt” she said without preface “of a little man in a boat”.

At this  I laughed heartily, and refilled my pipe.  “You seem to have mistaken these lodgings for those of my esteemed colleague Herr Doktor Freud, who practices in the next street over.  He is an alienist by training, whereas I am a detective.  My practice concerns the investigation of crime;  while his, by contrast, is the unearthing of the concealment of a crime.”

This all seemed rather to go over her head, for she took no notice, but began fidgeting in her chair, and then went on.  “It is concerning a crime that I consult you.”

“R-real-ly,” I drawled, amused.  “You interest me exceedingly.  And just which might this ‘crime’ amount to?”  I puffed at my pipe, and penetrated her with my gaze.

Here she flushed.  “A--  a child is being beaten,” she managed to stammer, and then fell silent.

I made no response, thus forcing her to go on.

“A -- child is being beaten, a child is being beaten,” she chanted, rocking rhythmically back and forth in her chair.  

I fear I may have so strayed from my gaming-face as to cock a skeptical eyebrow.  “I see.  And just -- where is this … child?”  Knowing full well that it was “in the boat”.

At this she flushed crimson, and turned her face away.  “How -- dare you.”

Thereupon I smiled, not unkindly.  “I have just the thing for you,”  I said.  And, tearing a prescription-blank from Dr Watson’s pad, I wrote out, in a bold hand,

Veretrum normale -- dosim repetatur.

She nodded a curt acknowledgement, took the sheet, and whisked out of the room.



 ~
The enigma of a woman’s heart,
finally espied  by a Private Eye,
for less than the price  of a Valentine …
This Rose
[Kindle]  [Nook]


[Update, 16 March 2014/1914]   One hundred years ago to the day:  the assassination of Gaston Calmette, editor in chief of Le Figaro.   Illustrating other useful applications of the muff:

L'épouse du ministre, Henriette Caillaux, après la publication par Calmette d'une lettre signée "Ton Jo" que l'homme politique avait adressée à sa future épouse, alors qu'elle n'était encore que sa maîtresse et qu'il était marié à Berthe Gueydan3, se rend à la rédaction du journal, tue son directeur, qui venait de recevoir l'écrivain Paul Bourget, en vidant le chargeur de son pistolet automatique (un Browning modèle sac à main  caché dans son manchon).

Psychological side-note:   It was not only the wrist-muff that proved useful to the murderess (in concealing the murder-weapon), but the nether one as well.   In view of the attractions of the latter, the jury simply acquited her:  she served no time, and paid no fine.

For the best in detective fiction,
check out the website of those wise-cracking, gat-packing Private Eyes,
the Murphy Brothers:


[Sidenote:   As well, a simple parasol, may serve as a handy murder-weapon, for a lady so equipped.    Read all about it here (footnote at the end of the essay): ]

.

Thursday, August 30, 2012

Frontiers of Feminism


From Freud’s letter to his fiancée, 1885, describing the scene on the Champs-Elysées:
Die nobeln Damen gehen dort  mit einer Miene  spazieren, als wollten sie  die Existenz der Welt, ausser sich und ihren Männern,  leugnen  oder doch  gütigst übersehen.

 ~

(This will probably get me disinvited to high tea at Bryn Mawr, but c'est la vie.  As well be hanged  for a sheep  as a lamb.)


Meet the world’s richest woman!

Gina Rinehart, the world's richest woman

Just in case you were beginning to think rich people were deeply misunderstood and that they feel the pain of those who are less fortunate, here's the world's wealthiest woman, Australian mining tycoon Gina Rinehart, with some helpful advice.
"If you're jealous of those with more money, don't just sit there and complain," she said in a magazine piece. "Do something to make more money yourself -- spend less time drinking or smoking and socialising, and more time working."Myess ... , let them eat cake.
Cake is for our kind.  Let them eat Twinkies.


Aloft she bears  her towering head,
filled with conceit  of her own pre-eminence
-- Fielding, Tom Jones (1749)


Rinehart made her money the old-fashioned way: She inherited it. Her family iron ore prospecting fortune of $30.1 billion makes her Australia's wealthiest person and the richest woman on the planet.
"There is no monopoly on becoming a millionaire," she said by way of encouragement.
Just in case you were beginning to think rich people were deeply misunderstood and that they feel the pain of those who are less fortunate, here's the world's wealthiest woman, Australian mining tycoon Gina Rinehart, with some helpful advice.
"If you're jealous of those with more money, don't just sit there and complain," she said in a magazine piece. "Do something to make more money yourself -- spend less time drinking or smoking and socialising, and more time working."


You… can’t … make…. this… stuff …  up ………….
You… can’t … make…. this… stuff …  up ………….

For her plebeian soulmate, click here:

And now for something completely different:
         In Praise of Dames

[Update 5 Sept 2012]
Can't make this stuff up, folks, so I won't even try.
She's back: World's richest woman makes case for $2-a-day pay

[Update 11 Sept]  Further Antoinettery:
Ann Romney doesn’t understand poverty
Someone who appreciated the plight of the poor would not have trivialized it with campy stories from her let’s-pretend past.


~

As background to one of his dreams, Sigmund Freud recounts (in Traumdeutung) a railway journey  he once endured;  appropriate, that, since literary depictions of Strangers-on-a-Train  invariably partake of the oneiric.
Anyhow, the train was packed, and he was obliged (with appropriate excuses) to insert himself into a cabin already occupied by a married couple.   They frostily snubbed him;  and the wife placed her umbrella on the window-seat across from her, so as to bar it to the intruder.
So far so good (bad);  but then Freud offers  a curious general psychosociological observation, of the sort that is rare in his writings:

Nach meinen Reiseerfahrungen  kennzeichnet ein so rücksichtslos übergreifendes Benehmen  Leute, die ihre Karte nicht  oder nur halb bezahlt haben.  Als der Konducteur kam, und ich mein teurer erkauftes Billet vorzeigte, tönte es aus dem Munde der Dame  unnahbar und wie drohend:  Mein Mann hat Legitimation.

(One of the symbols of sociopolitical corruption in America around a hundred years ago, was the railroad pass, handed out to curry favor with the influential.  Apparently Austro-Hungary had rather the same thing.)

With her, as with Gina Rinehart:  The men who, by their own efforts and sweat, make their first million, are often ornery enough; but their widows and heiresses  are insufferable.


~

We had thought to have done;  yet, unexpectedly,  some pages later, Freud recurs to this dream:  and this, in a very strange way.   The context is the unearthing of what is concealed in dreams -- more precisely, how the analyst may be led to the nub, when the patient
(a) upon being bidden to repeat the account of the dream, recounts a certain passage with transmogrified wording,
(b) suddenly recalls a passage of the dream  previously unrelated.
(In this case, the patient is himself.)

First, the not-so-strange part (apart from the strangeness  of recurring to it at all):

Es ist dies ein Reisetraum,  der Rache nimmt  an zwei unliebenswürdigen Reisegefährten, den ich  wegen seines  zum Teil  grobunflätigen Inhaltes  fast ungedeutet gelassen habe.

So:  This roughly corresponds to condition (b).
He goes on:

Das ausgelassene Stück  lautet:  Ich sage auf ein Buch von Schiller:  It is from … Korrigiere mich aber, den Irrtum selbst bemarkend, It is by … Der Mann bemarket hieraut  zu seiner Schwester:  “Er hat es ja richtig gesagt.”

So much is straightforward:  The dream-judgment jibes with that of any experienced translator;  and, for reasons that Freud outlines, the slight initial mistranslation  is quite understandable.

-- At this point, we should, on the face of it, remove the discussion to some other post, unconnected with the (ostensibly) political business  with which we began.    But in the Freudian spirit of  things connected to other things, we shall leave the thread lie.

Freud then recounts an incident from the vacation in England, connected with that train-ride, as, at the seaside,

ein reizendes kleines Mädchen  zu mir trat  und mich fragte:  Is that a starfish?  Is it alive?  Ich antwortete:  Yes he is alive;  schämte mich aber dann der Inkorrektheit, und wiederholte der Satz richtig.

(I.e., changing “he” to “it”.)  Followers of this blog  will readily understand,  that in our estimation, Freud, als Dolmetscher, was right the first time;  but that is probably (not necessarily, but probably) nothing to the point.

What is to the point … well, must be left to our death-bed;  some things are simply ‘compartmented’, so to speak.


Freud’s writings go deep, or at least they try to.  And generally, you can follow his thought, though the reasoning may fall short of compelling assent.  But at this point, he loses me completely (le miel sur les lèvres).   After an obvious remark about the two meanings of ‘gender’ (das Geschlechtswort / das Geschlechtliche), he states:

Dies ist allerdings  einer der Schlüssel zur Lösung des Traumes.


and then (to my bafflement) appends cases of  Mo ~ Ma, as in “Matter and Motion”.  The Spanish values of the respective vowels  would be masculine ~ feminine;  but there he loses me;  I find no such key syllable in the dream which, suitably switched-out, yields the Traumgedanke.  (Other ideas suggest themselves, yet these too proved fruitless.)  Uniquely, he leaves the solution as ‘an exercise for the reader’ (“der wird sich das Fehlende  leicht ergänzen können”).