Showing posts with label religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label religion. Show all posts

Friday, October 30, 2015

"We cannot play games with Satan…”


Worst idea for a TV show ever:

ST. LOUIS, Oct. 29 (UPI) -- The Catholic archdiocese of St. Louis spoke out Thursday against a live exorcism that will be broadcast on cable television, warning that the "dangerous" event has not been sanctioned by the church.

Destination America is broadcasting the event, titled Exorcism: Live!, on Friday. It will take place in the St. Louis home that was the site of a purported Satanic possession that inspired William Peter Blatty's book The Exorcist, made into an Oscar-winning film in 1973.

"No exorcism can take place without the authority of the local Roman Catholic ordinary," auxiliary bishop emeritus Robert Hermann said in a statement.

The program will exorcise the actual home, not any person, where a young boy known as "Roland Doe" was the reported subject of a possession in 1949. Catholic priests performed a series of exorcisms to free the child from Satanic grip in the notorious case.

"No one has ever attempted to rid the lurking spirits and demons that inhabit this home -- until now," Destination America said in promotional material for the program.

The exorcism is said to be the first ever broadcast live, but the St. Louis archdiocese said such an extreme measure should not be treated as mere entertainment.

"Any attempt to use the solemn Rite of Exorcism as entertainment exposes all participators to the danger of future hidden satanic attack," Hermann said. "We cannot play games with Satan and expect to win."

"Anyone involved in this production who claims to be a member of the Catholic clergy is not affiliated with the Archdiocese of St. Louis nor are they operating under the authority of the Vatican," Jones said. "Any purported exorcism ... for the purposes of entertainment trivializes this ancient rite of the Roman Catholic Church and the very real danger of evil."

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2015/10/29/Catholic-archdiocese-warns-against-dangerous-exorcism-planned-for-live-TV/8541446150609/

~

It was towards the end of his career as a private detective, that Michael Murphy finally encountered a case  he knew he could not handle, and knew better than to try. And so he called in a Specialist:



Sunday, September 14, 2014

Philological footnote to the President's address to the nation concerning ISIL


[We examined the speech in extenso here.   And now, an afterthought.]

The proposition that no true religion advocates the killing of innocents, is open to two logico-linguistic escape-hatches.

(1)  The classic “No True Scotsman” maneuvre.  (Thus, any religion that does advocate this, is no true religion.  -- The chief mufti of KSA has taken the same tack as Obama on this.)
(2)  One must pose the ever-relevant Clintonian Question:  in this case, “It depends upon what the meaning of 'innocent' is."   If the label is refused to those who profess a doctrine other than the received one (as has happened throughout history), the proposition becomes vacuous.
And though the fires of Lichfield have died down for a time, the matter is of more than archival interest:
And with slightly different emphases:

[Update] For a thoughtful essay along these lines, try this:

http://www.catholicculture.org/commentary/otn.cfm?id=1052
~

Additionally, a nuancing update to this essay:


A very perceptive article in today’s Neue  Zürcher Zeitung, pointing out some overlooked similarities between goose and gander:

Allzu oft wird weggehört, denn gross ist das Bedürfnis, im Kampf gegen Putins rabiates Expansionsbedürfnis nur noch Gut und Böse gelten zu lassen. Kriege vernichten intellektuelle Grauzonen. Das ist ein fataler Fehler. Nicht alles, was auf ukrainischer Seite kämpft, ist gesättigt mit europäischen Werten und demokratisch. Sogar in der Selbsteinschätzung Odnoroschenkos ist das Asowsche Bataillon eine «rechtsextreme, nationalistische» Organisation. Dies zu bemänteln, ist schädlich, denn es diskreditiert die solide, westliche Argumentation gegen Putin.
http://www.nzz.ch/nzzas/nzz-am-sonntag/bei-den-rechtsextremen-huetern-mariupols-1.18383251

.

Sunday, July 28, 2013

Social notes from Copa: SlutWalk welcomes the Pope

.


For our earlier reportage on this global phenomenon,
conslut -- I mean consult -- this:

Sunday, February 3, 2013

Word of the Day: «ultralaïcard» (bis)

[Again, a re-post, merely and purely to deprive the evil Web-bots of their landing-site, which now has been deleted.]


Headline in Le Figaro (Paris):

Marine Le Pen espère que la grande majorité des Français, devenus indifférents aux religions, ne lui tiendront pas rigueur de son idée d'interdir le voile ou la kippa dans la rue.

There is no word for this in English;  a good translation would be “supersecular”.   Even that will still not give the flavor, to Americans who have never lived with an established State religion.  
Marine Le Pen, who inherited the mantle of her father Jacques, is France’s most prominent …. what?  I was going to say “right-wing politician”, or perhaps ultraconservative, but again, in an American context, where those tendencies are associated largely with Christian evangelicals, her initiative will sound baffling.  For what she is proposing is to ban the wearing of a head-scarf or a yarmulke in the street.
Yes, you read that right.  Not making it up -- toleja, I’ve retired from satire, the world is just too weird.  A state ban on private citizens displaying religious symbols is the sort of bogeyman that keeps American conservatives up at night.

You picture the headlines:

Cops Nab Bar Mitzvah Boy
Bicycle chase through the crowded streets of Paris

In the context of Old World history, such a proposal is not as far-fetched as it sounds to us here.  Ataturk implimented much more drastic sumptuary laws when he took power in Turkey.


*
Pour d’autres friandises
de la confiserie 
du docteur Justice,
consultez:

*

The readers’ comments upon this article  are not the sort of thing an American would expect;  I’ll quote a few of the most colorful.

La kippa est, malheureusement pour elle, le Cheval de Troie des communautaristes de toutes natures.
À choisir entre interdire la kippa et accepter les diverses sortes de cagoules, le choix est malheureusement clair:
Il faut interdire la kippa.
Ce serait d'ailleurs une interdiction toute provisoire:
La disparition de ce Cheval de Troie priverait de carburant une grande partie des jusqu'au-boutistes musulmans.
Ils se retrouveraient en slip, ou plutôt: en burkini.
--
Marine Le Pen a tout à fait raison, au grand dam de notre journaliste qui cherche à mettre les propos de MLP à tort. Elle n'a jamais interdit le port de la soutane, ou De la croix (qui font parti de notre patrimoine et de nos coutumes). Ce qu'elle veut dire surtout c'est qu'il faut arrêter ce communautarisme du à l'immigration musulmane qui mine notre pays et qui met en grave danger notre façon de vivre. Ces minorités sont constamment en conflit avec notre république et essayent de nous imposer leurs Us et coutumes
--
Ma fille est religieuse et je trouverais inadmissible qu'elle soit obligée de retirer son voile.
Et je préfère voir une femme musulmane avec son voile, qu'une autre qui montre ses fesses ou exhibe sa poitrine comme une prostituée.
Marine a poussé son bouchon laïcard un peu loin...
--
Le FN, parti laïque et franc-mac, c'est le monde à l'envers…

I won’t undertake to translate these;  culturally, they are untranslatable.

*
Si cela vous parle,
savourez la série noire
en argot authentique d’Amérique :

*
~


In the Netherlands, the most prominent right-wing anti-immigrant hardliner is the flamboyant bouffant-bottle-blond  Geert Wilders, -- digne héritier of Pym Fortuyn (who, however,  as badge and emblem of one knows not what subvariety of paraphilia, sported a shaved pate) -- whose most recent proposal for keeping the riff-raff in their place  is to flood Holland’s streets with police-dogs, since Muslims don’t like them:

Les chiens et la circoncision

(Actually, I know what it is like  to live like that, since when I was there as a graduate student, Berkeley was flooded with dogs:  only, it was the riff-raff themselves that brought them.)

That radio essay, by journalist Fouad Laroui, also touches upon the bizarre anti-circumcision campaign in Germany, likewise directed against the Other.  It all reads very strangely for an American of my generation:  in my age-cohort, babies were routinely circumcised.   My best friend for a while was a Norwegian-born boy, who felt quite weird and isolated, since he didn’t look like anyone else in the showers.


*     *     *
~ Commercial break ~
Relief for beleaguered Nook lovers!
We now return you to your regularly scheduled essay.

*     *     *
[Encouraging update!] Two weeks later, M. Laroui offers another radioessay:
Turns out the Dutch are not that crazy.

~

For more wild ‘n’ wacky words, click here:  logophilia.
Pour davantage à propos de l’Hexagone, cliquez ici:  francophonie

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Romney’s Overseas Shenanigans


A recent report on Mitt Romneys machinations:


There are two aspects to this:

(1)  The outsourcing of American jobs, via Romney’s wholly-owned company, Bain.
(2)  The squirreling-away of ill-gotten gains  in offshore accounts, e.g. Switzerland and the Cayman Islands.

Now -- for the record -- I actually doubt that Romney is technically guilty of any felony, as some Democrats have suggested.   The reason being -- as someone once observed -- “The scandal is not the illegal financial activity going on --  the scandal is what is actually legal.”   Dumb guys simply rob a bank;  smart guys, like Romney, found one, and siphon the funds.


A word to our beloved Republican buddies:
Wouldn’t you like to peek under the hood, before shelling out for this rattletrap?  If your candidate is a crook, wouldn’t you prefer that this matter be handled before the miscreant is actually nominated?  Do you really desire another Watergate ??

Today’s speculations about what he’s hiding:

Where there’s smoke, there’s fire!

[Update]  As more voices join the chorus:  Come clean!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mitt-romneys-taxing-delay/2012/07/18/gJQAitY5tW_story.html?hpid=z2

[Flash update!]  Mitt -- All is forgiven!  Thank U for saving the orphaned baby penguins !!



~     ~     ~

[Update]


A thoughtful though admonishing Comment (see below) deserves an equally thoughtful reply.

Dear Mormonchess:


You make several valid points, in particular the one about shunning, which illustrates the great value to public morality  of belonging to a faith community such as LDS.  The curious workplace where I currently find myself (owing to certain notorious September events) has put me in intimate proximity with a fair number of patriotic Mormons, and I have come greatly to value their service over the years.  Moreover,  in the matter of the importance of traditional family values, the Church’s position  and my position  are two peas in a pod. So, this-all is not about that.
Nor do I suggest that Mr. Romney personally has been more culpable in his business practices than the general run of Titans of Finance:  but that is just the point.  The general run is increasingly cynical, high-rolling, and dismissive of labor -- and actively hostile to the trade unions;  no worker today in America should be voting for a Titan of Finance.   The beguiling phrase “whatever legal means is necessary to keep the State out of his wallet” conceals a gaping paralogism :  for it is the fat cats who write the tax laws.   You do know that the marginal tax rate on the rich was much higher under Reagan and Eisenhower  than it is now under Obama;  and even that understates what the wealthy are getting away with, since they have set up so many shelters and loopholes for themselves. Once again, the true scandal is not illegal behavior by the very rich;  the scandal is what-all is legal.

As for your suggestion that I abstain from political commentary:  it may come as a surprise, but devoutly do I as well so wish!  This blog was founded upon the subject of Theologia Mathematica, with its twin pillars of theism and Platonic Realism.   At my stage of life, the passing spectacle here below is a mere distraction; to dwell upon the ephemera of our inane political campaigns, excrutiating.  Yet at the prospect that the party which brought us into Iraq on the back of a lie, and then left it open to plunder by the likes of Halliburton and Blackstone, might be poised to recapture the White House and Congress -- No, no, the very stones cry out.  We saw what they did with it under Dubya and Cheney and Tom DeLay and the rest, and it wasn’t a pretty sight.

[Update 19 July]  And now this:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/compost/post/ann-romney-vs-you-the-people/2012/07/19/gJQAVWF1vW_blog.html?hpid=z3
“We’ve given all you people need to know,” said Ann Romney on “Good Morning America” Thursday, asked about the Romney tax returns.

You there, my good man -- See to it that my dressage horse is properly stabled.


It just keeps getting better and better.

~    ~    ~

More about the crooks in the world of high finance:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/elizabeth-warren-libor-fraud-exposes-a-rotten-financial-system/2012/07/19/gJQAvDnDwW_story.html?hpid=z2

You really want these clowns running the economy?


Oh -- and now this as well:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-bain-creation-20120719,0,192124.story
 
Mitt Romney's firm raised more than a third of its first investment fund from wealthy foreigners — who mostly used companies in Panama, then known for tax advantages and banking secrecy.
You open the closet door, and see what-all comes tumbling out.

~

[Update 20 VII 12]  And this:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dana-milbank-romneys-encouragement-of-the-obama-conspiracies/2012/07/20/gJQAlFXWyW_story.html?hpid=z3

~

[Update 21VII 12]  And now, domestic shenanigans re overseas events.

Flinging fairy-dust in the voters’ eyes, Romney now attempts to disparage our President’s watchful, forceful and measured response to the Syrian crisis.  Since passions on this side of the Atlantic are too enflamed to permit objective comment from either side, let us quote some intelligent and measured responses from readers in France:

Pourquoi est-ce que l'échec diplomatique de Barack Obama en Syrie serait pire que celui de l'Organisation des Nations Unies?
Si Barack Obama n'avait rien tenté, il aurait été critiqué. Il a tenté mais échoué, il est critiqué. Si il avait réussi sa tentative diplomatique, il aurait également été l'objet de critiques: ingérence dans les affaires d'autrui, manoeuvre à but électoral, que sais-je? J'ai un souvenir de François Hollande critiquant l'engagement de Nicolas Sarkozy en Libye, amenuisant la libération du peuple libyen. La mauvaise foi n'est pas une exclusivité Socialiste française.
Enfin, la critique est aisée mais l'art est difficile: les critiques de ceux qui ne font rien ne devraient pas entraver la marche de ceux qui essayent d'agir.

Est-ce que Obama est péesident du monde ? Est-ce que Obama est président de la Ligue Arabe ou est-ce que son pays fait partie des voisins de la Syrie ? Est-ce que Obama est le chef des Nations Unies ?
Pourquoi demande t-on et attend t-on des USA ce que nous n'attendons pas des TOUS les autres pays du monde réunis ou de la Ligue Arabe ou de Organisations de pays islamiques ou de l'Union Européen ?
Être un pays démocratique comme les USA ne dit que ce pays et son président sont plus humains que les autres sur terre. Être le pays le plus riche ne dit pas les autres ne peuvent pas faire mieux en s'ils mettaient toutes leurs ressources ensemble. Alors pourquoi ne le font-ils pas ? (Attendent ils les naïfs Américains?)
L'Amérique a bon dos. Juste pour donner bonne conscience aux autres qui ne veulent rien faire de décisives.
Après avoir demandé aux USA de ne pas se mêler des affaires intérieurs des autres nations, on les blâme maintenant de ne pas intervenir plus agressivement.
On doit les prendre pour des c...ns

That last word, which in its full form rhymes with bons,  refers to Romney’s assessment -- possibly accurate, alas -- of the average American voter.




Note:   Unless you have some cognizance of the Syrian situation, the flippancy and opportunism of Romney’s interventions will not be apparent.  The fact is, there is no ‘Syrian opposition’, in the sense of an entity, of a side that one could back.  It’s not like North and South Vietnam.  As has been widely reported in the press, there are myriad scattered groupuscules, lacking prior familiarity with one another, and chary of building mutual relations owing to the immense and practiced Syrian security apparatus.  So, which faction does Romney back?  Jabhat-al-Nusrah, perhaps?  (Note to cognoscenti:  That would be a big oops.)

[Update 24 juillet 2012]   Over twenty… trillion dollars are hiding out in overseas/offshore/off-the-books accounts:

“Entre 21.000 et 32.000 milliards de dollars, soit 17.000 à 25.500 milliards d'euros, continueraient à être dissimulés dans ces zones défiscalisées.”

[Update 25 July] An unusually thoughtful piece from Maureen Dowd:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/25/opinion/dowd-hiding-in-plain-sight.html?src=me&ref=general



Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Left-handed compliment


Never having been an Anglican, and now less than ever contemplating becoming one, it is not my place to comment on internal Church politics.  But this comment from a reader of the New York Times, upon the occasion of the retirement of ABC Williams, did catch the attention:

As an atheist, I believe that Rowan Williams did an outstanding job to bring his church into the 21 century.

Hard to argue with that.