Showing posts with label Saint Francis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Saint Francis. Show all posts

Sunday, January 31, 2016

Tinybird is careful


pecking on the deck  at the seed we spread
over the else sustenance-hiding  snow,
Tinybird revels  in the unseasonal feast,
hopping like a miniature dinosaur.

At the glass door, I crouch and watch.
But Tinybird does not wish to be a meal for the gigantic man,
and instantly she spots me,
she flees to the trees.

‘Tis then that I rise,  with grand spreading gesture,
fling open the door,  appear,
and cast  another seed-spray  visibly into the air,
the while  making irenic smoochy-sounds.

Ah, bright herald  of a lighter, loftier world,
Tell me what thou heardest from Saint Francis!

Sunday, November 9, 2014

Saint Francis plays Bach’s “Musette in D”


… for the benefit of a bird.

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa8Wqn2fDaA

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Singing Nuns

[Update Sunday, 2 December 2012]  The latest in this multi-faceted saga:

Nun Uses Music to Convey Spirited Message Against the Vatican’s Rebuke
When Kathy Sherman was in college during the final years of the Vietnam War, she played the guitar with friends in her dorm room and sang folk and protest songs over bowls of popcorn. They sang Peter, Paul and Mary and Joan Baez, and some friends said her voice reminded them of Judy Collins.
Ms. Sherman graduated and joined an order of Roman Catholic nuns, the Sisters of St. Joseph of La Grange, but she never stopped making music. Last spring, when the Vatican issued a harsh assessment of the group representing a majority of American nuns accusing them of “serious doctrinal problems,” Sister Sherman, 60, said she responded the way she always does when she feels something deeply. She wrote a song.

The story goes on in this happy-talk vein, right to the end, steering clear of doctrinal matters.  As well it should.   Ms. Sherman (as the article refers to her, in addition to “Sister Sherman”)  is no doubt a lovely person, with a delightful voice, and the song is surely swell to listen to.  A perfect story for Sunday morning.   Only, the headline suggests that this all serves towards an actual rebuttal of the Vatican rebuke -- a true contribution to a genuine debate;  which it is not.

When I was in college during the Vietnam War, I too sat around in a circle with other young folks, singing, with such accessories as popcorn and a guitar.  And one day (moving incognito among the villagers like Harun al-Rashid) I sat with a group of young Weathermen (you could almost call them:  Weatherchildren) in Cambridge, Massachusetts, all happily singing, campfire-fashion, with shining eyes:

We lo-hove Ho Chi Mi-hi-hi-hinh!
We lo-hove Ho Chi Mi-hi-hi-hinh!
I say deep down in our hearts  (Right on!)
I say deep down in our hearts  (For sure!)
I say Deep  -- “Deep!”
I say Down  -- “Down!”
I say deep down in our hearts  …

Which was all fine and good; but it was not a substantive contribution to the geopolitical debate.

The Vatican did not go after certain public actions and declarations of American nuns because it wished to stifle “Love” (as the song sings), or any light-hearted campfire-girl ethos.   It rebuked an unambiguous defiance of major Church doctrines.  Ms Sherman and her singing sisters no doubt have wonderful values, and can find a comfy home for them in your friendly neighborhood Unitarian Church.
The point is logical, not theological, and quite elementary.  Say you join the International Society for the Prevention of Penguins, and then go about handing out leaflets saying “Hooray for penguins!  Let’s have more penguins!”  Your sentiments may be admirable, but you do not belong in the International Society for the Prevention of Penguins.

*     *     *
~ Commercial break ~
Relief for beleaguered Nook lovers!
We now return you to your regularly scheduled essay.

*     *     *


A similar case from history, of a rift that were best made explicit:

Jung was long in admitting his desertion of psychoanalysis, and did not see why he should not hold radically different views from Freud.  There was, of course, no reason at all … But what troubled Freud was what he called sailing under false colors.
-- Ernest Jones, Freud: Years of Maturity (1955), p. 362

~

[Earlier post from 20 Nov 2012]

NPR just did a segment on how an album of Gregorian chants and traditional hyms  by an American convent of Benedictine nuns  has become the top seller in its category.  This in itself is welcome news, on several levels, the moreso as it reportedly displaces an album whose sole selling-point was a purely factitious publicity tie-in to a bestselling opuscule of sadomasochistic housewife porn. 
(That album itself is quite blameless, by the way.  I clicked on the playlist at Amazon, half-fearing to find things like the Velvets’ “Venus in Furs”, but the selections are all quite classical, even restrained.)

This rare popular breakthough of Catholic music  put me in mind of a song that was at the top of the charts when I was thirteen years old: “Dominique”, by a Francophone Belgian Dominican, Sœur Sourire, “the Singing Nun”.   The “Dominique” in question  I assumed at the time, in my blinkered American monoglot ignorance, to be a girl’s name;  whereas in fact the reference is to Saint Dominic. the founder of her Order.   The refrain is catchy, and its protagonist -- though no maid as I had fondly imagined -- sounds more like a rosy-cheeked St. Francis  than the formidable Dominic:

Dominique -inique -inique 
s'en allait tout simplement,
Routier, pauvre et chantant.
En tous chemins, en tous lieux,
Il ne parle que du Bon Dieu,
Il ne - parle - que - du - Bon - Dieu.

Quite charming, and well-sung.  But dig a bit, and the picture becomes rather more nuanced... 

The full French lyrics are difficult to find;  after googling for a while, I gave up and dredged them up from my desktop:

A l'époque  Jean Sans Terre,
D'Angleterre était le roi
Dominique notre père,
Combattit les albigeois.

The song,  you see, commemorates the Albigensian Crusade, a twenty-year bloodbath in the early thirteenth century.   Its principal target was the Cathar heresy,  though its far-reaching social effects went well beyond that.

The methods of this adventure were purely benevolent  in the Sister’s telling:

Certains jours un hérétique,
Par des ronces le conduit
Mais notre Père Dominique,
Par sa joie le convertit

However, when “joy” failed to turn the trick (nay, this very word joy has rather soured for us, ever since, a couple of years later, the egregious Hubert Humphrey peddled the “politics of joy” in his Presidential campaign -- a slogan absurdly out of tune with the times) -- when joy failed, there was always torture, wholesale massacre, and burning at the stake. 

Now, readers of this blog will have gathered that I greatly reverence the teachings of the Historical Church.  Yet somehow the Albigensian Crusade is not one of those episodes that cause me to leap from my couch with the rise of Brother Sun, warbling like a nightingale.    It has … shadows, and soft spots, and aspects discutables.  Among other things, it was responsible for the destruction of the troubadour culture. By all means let us study its history, with sobriety and without a smug Whiggish hindsight:  the Cathar heresy was indeed grave.  Still and all, it was a most unsuitable subject for the sugar-coated nursery-rhyme treatment of Sœur Sourire.

~

In a bizarre afterpiece to the whole dubious affair, Sœur Sourire, hounded by Belgium for back taxes, committed suicide (in the Catholic view, a mortal sin), along with her lesbian lover.   And unfortunately (though I shall refrain from exploring the possible subterranean connections to our present case), this may be more than a mere tabloid sidelight.

I did not intend this post to relate in any way to NPR -- the point I began by intending to address  was simply the Albigensian crusade.   It was just that I happened to hear about the new album on “All Things Considered”.   Yet in the course of attempting to google a link to the tale of this album -- which proved fruitless, whether in “News” mode or general -- I came across the following sobering account  of an earlier and even more bizarre bit of the NPR journalistic ethos, in a similar case:


National Public Radio usually avoids the snide contrast and goes for the real story.  So I was taken aback by the way they handled the news that the Benedictine Nuns of the Abbaye de Notre-Dame de l’Annonciation had signed a contract with Decca Records for a CD of Gregorian chant.  After all, I don’t recall any cute stories about the Chant CD by the monks of Santo Domingo de Silos when it soared to the top of the charts.

Here’s what they said, in its entirety:

“Lady Gaga now shares a record label with a band of soul sisters – that is, a group of Benedictine nuns. Universal Music’s Decca Records discovered them at their convent in France as part of a global search for the best singers of Gregorian Chants. Unlike Lady Gaga, the nuns probably won’t have to worry about paparazzi. They live a life hidden behind closed doors. As for costumes, well, they’ll likely stick with something traditional.”

Lady Gaga? What did she have to do with this story?  The answer is: nothing, other than recording on the Decca label.

It would appear that the “hook” of that NPR piece  was not a genuine concern for the austere beauties of plainchant, let alone for the Catholic faith to which such observation gives tongue, but was rather its juxtaposition to the obscenely meretricious Lady Caca (as she is more aptly styled).   Such is the aethetics -- and the ethics -- of “Piss Christ”.

The aesthetic recurs, though somewhat attenuated, in the present piece:

Fifty Shades of Grey: The Classical Album has been on Billboard's Classical Traditional Albums chart for 11 weeks, most recently in the top slot. But the album has been bumped this week by The Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles — a group of singing nuns from Missouri. The Benedictines' album is called, Advent at Ephesus.

The nuns are indulged, but patronized;  one woman comments, with a sort of fey guffaw, “they’re really unplugged.”

The grotesque condescension of the NPR treatment  is quickly refuted by a glance at the interview with the charming, lively, aware, and beautifully well-centered, prioress of this nunnery:


Indeed, we might posit that the prioress and her sisters are indeed plugged-in -- but plugged into something more central and sound and essential than whatever fantasies flit through the minds of the masscult onanists  while they’re whacking off to Fifty Shades of Grey.  We might further hazard that, like the Father Brown of “The Blue Cross” or “The Queer Feet”, whose knowledge of the depths of crime far surprassed that possessed by the criminals, these sisters, despite the whiteness of their wimples, may well know more of the blackness of the human heart, than  that chattering airhead on NPR, whose summation was allowed to conclude the piece, to the effect that  the implicit equation of Fifty Shades of Grey  with Benedictine observance,  just goes to show that “art…”  (and by implication:  sexual morality, and religious faith) is “different for everybody” .  Algolagnia?  Necrophilia?  -- Hey, de gustibus.  That relativist’s night  in which all cats are shades of grey.


*
Commercial Break
A private detective  confronts the uncanny;
an ecclesiastical mystery:
*

[Historico-theological footnote]  Since the Cathar heresy had a horror of procreation, you might imagine that the simplest thing for the Church to do would have been simply to ignore it, allowing its adherents to naturally die out.  And yet, bizarrely, outside the self-cleansed RCC, the heresy lives on:

Q: You just took office as the first woman to head the Episcopal Church…
Episcopalians aren’t interested in replenishing their ranks by having children?
A: No. It’s probably the opposite. We encourage people to pay attention to the stewardship of the earth and not use more than their portion.


Thus, Bishop Shori finds herself in nominal agreement with the butler Ferris (promising material there:  “A bishop and a butler walk into a bar…”):

“Marriage is not a process for prolonging the life of love.  It merely mummifies the corpse.”
“But, Mr Ferris, if there were no marriages, what would become of posterity?”
“I see no necessity for posterity.”
“You disapprove of it?”
“I do.”
-- P.G. Wodehouse, The Purloined Paperweight (a.k.a. Company for Henry) (1967)


She is likewise at one with the Dickensian misanthrope Bitser, the boss’s stooge informer in Hard Times, who, expressing his contempt for the laboring population from which he rose, delivers himself of this choice opinion, to the great approbation of the withered widow Sparcit:

“I’m sure we are constantly hearing, ma’am, till it becomes quite nauseous, concerning their wives and families,” said Bitser.  “Why, look at me, ma’am!  I don’t want a wife and family;  why should they?”
“Because they … are im-prov-i-dent,” said Mrs Sparsit.

I say “nominal” because, unlike that butler, she probably lacks the courage of her convictions.  Were she asked, did her observations apply equally to those of African extraction, she would doubtless blush furiously and retort, “Of course not!”  She likewise may be presumed among the supporters of the octomom…

I jest a bit, citing Wodehouse;  but truly, hers is as foul a heresy as any that has ever blotted the face of Christendom.


[Update]  Just happened upon this, which I fling in the face of that Bishopess:

Renée has this upstairs neighbor who is a member of the Art Mafia.  She has her own gallery in Soho, along with a drinking problem, and she is unbearable.  She plays her quadrophonic machine at all hours, full blast.
I don’t know which Mafia I dislike the most.  I’m leaning toward liking the Italian Mafia  because they are just immoral  and still believe in mother and child.  But the Art Mafia is immoral and, from what I can tell, they’ve stopped procreating.
-- Spalding Gray, Swimming to Cambodia (1985)

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

The Thinking Flowers


Bubbles of loveliness
rise from the roses
like speech balloons

“We are so happy, we are so grateful
for the sun and the sky and the bees and the rain ….”


[for the bee's perspective,  click here:
http://worldofdrjustice.blogspot.com/2012/05/bees-eye-view.html ]

Monday, July 30, 2012

Minimalism and Entomology


This blog was begun in defense of Platonism -- sword flashing, doubts to the rear.
The emergent theme of Minimalism  has been experimental … feeling our way forwards…
But just at this moment (this very night) the idea presents itself, of a relation between Minimalism   and this:
(And thus, with theology.)

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

The Woodchuck’s Paternoster





[In nomine  Francisci  Sancti]

Papa…Papa… somewhere Up there…so big… very Big…. Bigger than big…   Thank you.
Someday mebbe we get to see U.   U R da boss -- Same up there, same down here.
Help us find food.  Srsly srry about the the bad stuff we done.  Don’t let the mean beasts eat us up.
Srsly Urz,
Teh Woodchucks.

[Scholars will not fail to note a certain intertextual echo with the LOLcats Bible.  But where kittehs are snarkeh, anything the humble woodchuck says, comes straight from his tiny beating heart.]


[NB:  This is not satire.  For a similar vision, click here:
http://worldofdrjustice.blogspot.com/2011/04/making-best-of-bad-bargain.html ]

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Congratulations are in order

Suzanne and I just got back from a misty lakeside postdrizzle stroll.  We saw some teenage geese -- last month’s crop of goslings.  Plus more little goslings newly arrived.  Seeing this, I had to hug her:  not once, but several times.



 Congratulations, Mrs. Goose and Mr. Gander !

[Update 10 May 2013]  Down to the lake... Goslings again!  Floating behind their proud parents.
...  World without end ...

Monday, October 24, 2011

“It depends upon what the meaning of ‘is’ is.”


President Clinton  acutely and relevantly spoke this truth, as the curs were baying at his traces.  
It went right over the head of most, and excited mere japery in the many.

Let us examine another example, of the relevance of tense.  Since this is a logico-linguistic exercise, rather than a religious polemic, assume  for the sake of argument  than everything asserted in the book to be discussed  is true.   Nothing hangs on this; our focus is the spin of the linguistics.

Browsing in the library, I happened upon the following title, by one Thomas Craughwell (2006):

Saints Behaving Badly

This title certainly catches the eye.  From a marketing standpoint, it is brilliant.  But then comes the subtitle:

The Cutthroats, Crooks, Trollops, Con Men and Devil Worshippers  who Became Saints

In other words:  We have not to do with saints who, while saints or as saints, did these terrible things; quite the contrary.   The subject treats of men and women who, in their original fallen state, did these dreadful things;  yet who, by God’s grace, were redeemed -- even these ! -- and later achieved sainthood. 
The natural implication of the actual title is that those so-called “saints” are a buncha hypocrites and goddam phonies, not nearly in the classy class of you’n me, as we sit here with our whore, in the bar, gambling on imaginary horses.  The subtitle has at least the honesty and decency  to take away what the title implies.

In all likelihood, the author is innocent of any ill-intention, the slimy title having been presumably imposed by sulphurous marketing-types (you know them from Dilbert, with their little horns and hooves)  over his strenuous objections.  

[Footnote:  Although  “Buffy” and “Angel”  are not remotely -- overtly -- Christian shows,  still the theme of redemption -- of difficult redemption -- of Spike and Angel, strikes a chord among any who have knelt and accepted the bread.]

[‘Nother footnote:  For a sternly beautiful portrait of a pre-Saint  behaving… well, not badly perhaps, but not as the Chamber of Commerce might wish him to behave,  cf. Chesterton’s biography -- succinct and to the point -- of St. Francis.]

On Critters



The conception that Hume wanted to root out  had its basis in religious belief.  Taking very seriously the saying that God created us in his own image, it saw us as hybrid beings, in this world but not entirely of it. … Animals are quite different.  They have no souls, but are just very subtle and complex machines, nothing more.   The really significant line comes between us and them, not between us and God.  Hume wanted to move it:  we are not inferior little gods, but somewhat superior  middle-sized animals.
--Edward Craig,  Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction (2002), p. 26

We earlier alluded, with smiling approval, to the thesis of the intrazoological ontological gap, as articulated by His Holiness the Pope.  (It’s a long essay; just scroll down to the picture of the naked lady with all her ontologically discontinuous animal-friends.)  Yet, alarmingly, as evidenced by the passage above-quoted, this God-given gap threatens to be pried open (by those busy goblins, the atheists, ever wielding their picks) into something gaping. 

So, note:  It’s a gap, not a chasm.   Hamsters are not tiny machines (What idle demiurge would have made them?); they are furry little wonderballs.   (For the diffeomorphic significance of their rotundity, click here.)

True, back in the day, ourselves squatting in the rain  around our pile of dismal sticks, waiting for some bright-guy to invent fire,  we may have cut no very dashing figure.   (Though you’d have been a fool to place your bets on what otherwise seemed pre-eminent, the sabre-tooths and the mastodons.)  But things have changed a bit since then.

There is truly no excuse for Hume.    Granted, he did not have access to the extensive literature on (to take an example entirely at random) the Urysohn Metrization Theorem, but he had already, not merely the results of Euclidean geometry, endlessly interesting though these be, but the example of the Axiomatic Enterprise -- an insight worthy of the Lawgiver.

~     ~     ~

As to what animals are, I don’t know, though I’ve made a stab at it  here and here.  For the real answer, you would have to ask  St. Francis.

Thursday, June 23, 2011

A New Tenant


A few weeks ago, I hung a pot of begonias from the front-porch lintel.  Sometimes I would water it in place, and sometimes, if rain was in the offing, I would set it out upon the lawn, that it might be refreshed from the gentle drops of heaven, unmediated by watering-can.
Beginning last week, whenever I would come out the front door, there would be a flurry of motion and a bursty blur, coming from the general direction of the begonias.   Like any creature of the forest, I was alarmed at first, but soon came to realize that it was a bird, making a hasty exit.
My first thought -- not really a thought, more like a daydream -- was appallingly unscientific:  that this bird came because she liked the flowers.   But she’s not a hummingbird, and regular birds don’t do nectar.  Plus she is here constantly, far too often for a nectar fix from this one little planting, when the cul-de-sac is bursting with gardens on every hand.   Then it dawned on me:  This bird is guter Hoffnung, and she has built a nest.

The world o’erturned.   No more dare I slosh the pot with water, drenching the eventual nestlings, nor set it out upon the lawn -- among the crafty cats.   But evicting her is out of the question.   Her choice, which had seemed quirky at first, in fact is splendid:  hung high above ground-based predators, and out of reach from any wood-climbing ones;  densely protected by the tufts of flowers from prying eyes.

And so it is to be.  She still takes fright -- takes flight -- when I emerge in all my hugeness from the house.  (Fair enough; though I would admire her the more, if she deems her clutch in peril, were she to stay and fight.)  But in time, and with the prayers of St. Francis, she may come to see me rather as a distant, benevolent protector.   For I have never so much as peered between the leaves, to spy what might lie there.   ‘Twould not be decent;  a gentleman simply does not do such things.   So I shall come and go, in silence and reverence;  and she shall sit and brood;  and together  we shall praise our Maker.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Happy Solstice !


In observation of this lovely day, we cite the observations of our friend Francis.

~  ~  ~

Laudato sie, mi Signore cum tucte le Tue creature,
spetialmente messor lo frate Sole,
lo qual è iorno, et allumini noi per lui.
Et ellu è bellu e radiante cum grande splendore:
de Te, Altissimo, porta significatione.



Sunday, December 19, 2010

The Penguin Passion


Checking again the dashboard, we notice a disturbing trend.  Plenty of pageviews from most of the continents (including Africa -- from Egypt), but… none from the great state of Antarctica!   This is intolerable!!

Accordingly, we here provide a review of my favorite film.  (The reference to the “Passion” concerns the Mel Gibson film that came out around the same time -- and which I also reviewed, if anyone is interested.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

HUT two three four (the penguin "Passion")

            A very good movie has managed to make it past the Cerberus of masscult-- and this despite the added stigma of having been originally French.  In the original it was called "La marche de l'Empereur"; it now is actually better, dubbed as "March of the Penguins".  The plural is important, as is the lack of all Imperial pretension.

            Nature photography has reached such a pitch of excellence in our time, that even the odd bit stumbled across while channel-surfing may be memorable and riveting.  But Hollywood does not trust it at feature length.   One of my fondest cinematic memories from childhood is the Disney film, "The Living Desert", yet it has had few progeny.  In 1971, some fine footage of insects made it into the theatres, but under the meaningless title of "The Hellstrom Chronicles"; it was given an  overheated pseudo-sci-fi wraparound, as though the public could not be trusted to take nature plain, but it must be sugar-coated, or rather  smeared with NutraSweet.

            Nothing of the sort  mars the present offering.  Indeed it is remarkably spare in its treatment, even classical.  The focus is relentless on the central fact of survival against odds, during a frigid and exhausting trek across the ice, in a dogged attempt to obey the commandment, Be fruitful and multiply, though one perish in the attempt.  It is not a popcorn movie.  It is a good date movie, but only with someone you are serious about. There is a complete abstention from the trivializing Wild 'n' Wacky World of Animals point of view.  Once, it is true, one of the pilgrims slips and falls, eliciting a laugh from the light-minded.  But in the stark context of this forced march along this frozen Via Dolorosa, it is rather as wrenching as those stumbles that mark the Stations of the Cross.  Though the movie deals in, and does not flinch from,  birth and death and love and grief and sacrifice and even madness, it has the delicacy and dignity (sorely missed) of early Hollywood, when faced with certain things that should be known, but yet not shown.  (Sex was what one imagined might have happened between the kiss and the cigarette, never depicted but only inferred.)  And despite the ever-present menace of death, we are spared the actual sight of blood.   As in the early days of cinema, before the rot of slasher movies, a killing was the more sobering for being seen as the wrenching of a soul from its moorings, rather than a mere mashing of meat.  This restriction required of the director, and of the audience, some artful indirection.  Here  the killer is the leopard seal, sliding along morosely under the ice; and the image that sticks with you is that of a succession of penguins escaping back through the one small hole in the ice -- pop! pop! pop! pop! until one, just p- p-- ahh... only the head emerges, then he slips back forever.

Nor, despite appearances, is the film truly or fully a science film, though it is factual, even soberly so.  Except as regards the great central ritual of the pilgrimmage, the film is sparing with information.  Where exactly on the continent are they nesting?  What is known of their evolutionary history, back to a flightless state?  (And were there prehistoric penguins as big as dinosaurs?) How long do penguins live? How many are there?  Are there other species of penguin, and do they all act – do they act at all like this? What species of sea-creatures do penguins eat?   And what is that bird that eats (or means to eat; mercifully we are not shown the meal) the clueless chicks?  (The folks sitting behind us hazarded it was a "condor"; the film never mentions the word "skua" or "gull".)   The movie lacks the wide-ranging interests (and thus distractability) of the amateur naturalist, pursuing each butterfly into the bush; in its single-mindedness it is almost more like Mel Gibson, resolutely excluding most of the Gospels  so as to focus on his one big theme.

In the memorable and defining opening shot, it is not even clear that we are dealing with a nature film at all.  We first see a handful of figures at a shimmering distance, like a mirage, as though this were  not snow  but baking sands.  The species is not discernable, nor the genus, nor the phylum even; we do not know if we are dealing with humans or with the jinn. (Much indeed as the eponymous protagonists of L’île des Pingouins first presented themselves to Saint Maël (on whom be peace), who baptised them, deeming them men.)  The dark shapes resemble nothing so much as the "black moving objects" in abaya-ridden Arabia: and the long slow patient annual ritual march that follows, has echos of the Hajj.

It is indeed, finally, a nature film, but it has been flavored with some other genre, which at first I could not quite place. The knee-jerk response is "Greek tragedy", for its sobriety and its sense of implacable destiny:  but really it is far from that.   For one thing, it lacks a hero, having rather unsung several thousands of them.   And there is no tragic flaw, but a collective trial.  One point of comparison does suggest itself -- and it too is Greek.   Namely, the march of the Ten Thousand, in the Anabasis of Xenophon.  There too, their agony was over  when they at last could cry, "The sea! The sea!"

*
There is something in the plight of penguins  that turns the contemplative mind to theology.  Simultaneously dignified and risible, vertical yet chained to the earth, soldiering on in their icy exile, devoid of every luxury and of every distraction from, as it were, the eternal questions.  The cineasts who made this film  will have been familiar with that work of their countryman, Anatol France, "L'ile des pingouins" (1908), which explores this theme at book-length.  We may ask: Whence comes this resonance?

First, Antarctica is itself, almost literally a fallen world.  Time was, it floated in milder climes, where the broad sun ripened the grape and vine, and the creatures of the forest  feasted thereon. Then, like Atlantis, it sank -- or rather slipped, tectonically, winding up (in a process that took longer than that angel's fall from the heights of heaven to the depths of hell) at the -- oh, *no*, not *this*! -- South Pole.   The sense of dismay is pungently summed up by the penguin mariners of the recent animated movie "Madagascar", who after an extended catabasis to their ancestral continent, standing in the gloom with no sounds but an ill wind, at length exclaim: "This sucks!"

Further, penguins are, almost literally, fallen birds.  Fallen from the sky, where, in despite of their bird-nature, they can no longer fly.  To see them trudge clumsily, mile after mile, on their little feet (they seem to have legs no more than wings), is to sense, what is true for us also:  We are not made for this, but for a better world.  (A truth that is obscured amid the glitter and blare of the malls, but stark upon the blinding ice.) 



And yet there is something prelapsarian about the penguins, a thing that indeed tugs at us  like a magnet  the filings, we in our fallen state.  We may quote the saint:
“Habitants de cette île, quoique vous soyez de petite taille, vous semblez moins une troupe de pêcheurs ... que le sénat d’une sage république. Par votre gravité, votre silence, votre tranquille maintien, vous composez sur ce rocher sauvage  une assemblée comparable aux Pères-Conscrits de Rome…”    

Ipse dixit.   They live in a world  at poles from Eden, yet a world stripped of all temptations, devoid of all, save necessarily of Him who is never absent, silent though He may be.  – I cannot resolve the contradiction.

The penguins have had no Messiah, so far as we know; they are still, it appears, waiting.  And waiting.  And waiting.  Yet there are echoes of Christian themes.   The most poignant scene in the movie is the lament of a mother over her dead chick: a penguin Pietà.  And we get  even a glimpse  of what might possibly be meant by the strange dogma of the resurrected body, when the coffle of mortals  in their gravitational chains  at last reach, and plunge into, the aqueous element,  and -- fly, fleet and unfettered, ----- utterly transformed.

*

I am fond, despite all, of that old hoaxster of an epigram, that "the fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one big thing".  What the epigram may mean, or what the hedgehog may know, I know not (though it is pleasant to have any occasion to be reminded of  the hedgehog, our modest and seldom-celebrated friend).   Yet having witnessed the life-cycle laid out here with such care, we are obliged indeed to affirm, that the penguin  at any rate  does know one gigantic thing, -- knows it single-mindedly to the possible exclusion of all else:  a thing as vast as the sky that overarches his little trajectory of life, a thing as wide as the ice which he must traverse with unrelieved weariness, always either starved or gorged, and as deep as the sea which renews him when it does not slay him:  and that is, fidelity.   Fidelity to the mate whom he feeds and is fed by; fidelity to the band with whom he huddles against the whipping winds, taking his turn at the periphery where there is nought to turn its lash; fidelity to the chick for whom he well may give his life, and over whom he grieves  if the cruel chill claims it.  - - And fidelity, philologers instruct us, is the etymon of faith; as it might be, the egg of it.

            St. Francis, it is said, preached to the fowl.  Had he managed to journey to that white world, he might have found a most attentive audience.




[© 2007  David B. Justice. -- article to appear in American Penguin (Oct 2036); reprinted with permission]