Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Firefox is Evil



Mankind has long been aware of the evil of Microsoft and all its works.   That is why I dumped my PC and bought a Mac, and switched to Firefox from Internet Explorer.

Only…
For the past several weeks, Firefox has been popping up a window, urging download of its own new version.  The options are:  Ravish me now;  Ravish me later.   There is no option for “Go away and die.”
Repeatedly, I clicked “Ask me later”, and hoped that it would eventually tire.  But as the Devil well knows, we tire before he does.  So at last I clicked, Do me.

One immediately saw the benefits of fiber-optic:  The caption said “Downloading… estimated time left 2 hours and 40 minutes” -- but no sooner had it posted that, than it switched to “estimated time left 7 minutes” and then immediately to “seven seconds”, and then, abandoning all pretense at precision,  “several seconds”.  And several seconds later, it was done.

Only…
A  message popped up, grim and terse in the style of traffic tickets or dunnings from the IRS:  “Firefox has detected an incompatibility with Google Desktop search 1.1.”

Now… Google Desktop search is the one program with which I am entirely satisfied.  For years, Microsoft operating systems got lamer and lamer at finding your files; how this Mac might do it, I have no idea; but Google just works.   So I was gratified to read the penitent subsequent message:

We are mortified that so basic an incompatibility should have escaped beta-testing.  All the engineers involved have been fired, and the executives executed.  Reverting to original version …

Only, no;  that’s not what it said.  It said:

Google Desktop has been disabled.

There was no appeal -- no “Undo” -- no “Torture the Firefox executives instead”.

Firefox is evil.


*     *     *
~ Commercial break ~
(Hey guys, gotta pay the bills...)
We now return you to your regularly scheduled essay.

*     *     *


Footnote:
It lied.  It may have tried to disable mighty Google desktop (whose wrath will be terrible), but the thing still works.   We have, thus, “a tyranny tempered only by its incompetence”, in Walter Lippmann’s phrase.

En revanche:  It silently swiped the default browser page I’d set up, replacing it with a less useful changeling. 
A friend told me how to fix this… but in this changing world, specific instructions may apply only to specifically configured machines.  I was obliged to reply:

Thanks for the suggestion.
Unfortunately, on this computer, there is no such option under "Edit".
Under "Firefox", I did find something that said "Use current pages"  --sic, plural, which makes no sense.  And running "Help" on "use current page" brought up something about color and HTML. 
But when I clicked it, being on the main Google/Mozilla page, or even when I specifically pasted in the URL,
it threw that away and substituted... one of my mailboxes, of all things.

Never mind, I eventually found out how.  It’s quite easy once you know how to do it -- but then, a safe is easy to open, once you know the combination.

Firefox is evil.


~


[Update 23 Nov 2011]
Once again an alarming pop-up invaded my screen, warning me that, unless I immediately downloaded many more megabytes of unknown content from Firefox, their defective product might allow very bad things to happen to my computer.
So naturally I complied.  And this time was pleased to see that a preliminary window noticed the presence of Google Desktop, and inquired whether I desired to retain this.   Much reassured, I replied that I would indeed, thank you very much.
Churn churn churn, download bytes upon bits hopefully not malware… Done.
And yet, after all that -- once again a message that Firefox refuses to play in the same sandbox as Google Desktop  and that the latter has accordingly been disabled !
Fortunately they lied.  Or perhaps they tried:  but the Great God Google (terrible is His name) eats firefoxes like fireflies, for breakfast.

3 comments:

  1. Firefox is not the evil. You are, for even doubting Firefox and Mozilla's competence. How dare you call Mozilla a tyranny? I bet you couldn't code Firefox to work with Google Desktop. Besides, the compatibility issue lies within the google desktop add-on. Any REAL firefox fan could tell you THAT much.

    How could you say something like that? How can you hate so much on something as perfect as Firefox? We can only wonder...

    -Punishwara Shankata Shri Paravalatra

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Great God Google bellows in reply:
    You *dare* to meddle with my lovely desktop app ???
    O flimsy, futile Firefox, we shall CRUSH you like a bug !!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. any real fire fox idiot could tell you anything to get you to adhere to the firefox cult.

    Look, the browser boom has not succeeded in giving developers more options... it ONLY has succeeded in making them lazier and having them make webpages "worse".

    Take Wikipedia's stance that we should intermingle XHTML with HTML. You should not, they are two entirely different formats. They are processed differently, read differently... but you're relying on the browsers ability to IGNORE the fact that you're incorrectly using XHTML Tags in HTML Document.


    You have more and more developers favouring the SLOWER Javascript Element Loading (DHTML) and other devs who only test their pages in the latest versions of firefox / ie to determine if they "work" (render).

    Running these through the w3 online checker often shows numerous errors (and mixing of the xhtml and html 4 formats) even google.com has errors... and that's absurd.


    People say how fast firefox is and how slow IE is... but the reality is that HTML was NEVER DESIGNED to become DHTML. In moderation it's okay, but the only people who like this are:

    A) Stupid People (OMG, HTML5 is AWESOME because we get quicktime in the browser!!!! [and firefox sucks cause they don't want to pay royalties for the codec])

    B) Stupider People (OMG, Did you see that menu that like totally improperly used element hiding but is slower than clicking and rendering a new html page? The fade-in and out is totally cool)

    C) Ignoramuses (See, now instead of waiting for the webpage to quickly render as all necessary data is downloaded immediately, we get to wait for that "javascript icon" to stop turning... but it's cool to watch)



    Mozilla isn't entirely responsible here... but with their push to say "Oh, we adopted more W3 Standards than You Did" they certainly aren't HELPING.


    But the thing is... more and more sites aren't Standards Compliant, and firefox CAN be blamed for that... as they have some kind of mess code that detects when developers aren't doing what they should be doing and "fixes it".

    So if someone uses an alternative browser, such as Opera (because if all you want is menu editing... XULRunner is overkill), even though the simple standards being used should supported... the way the developer uses it is INCORRECT

    One browser renders it exactly as the developer typed it... the other browser renders it as the developer MAY HAVE intended it. And that creates too many problems.




    Mostly, I'm tired of firefox idiots and their firefox movement. YES, XULRunner is great when you want it, and YES, I have a low version of firefox (as above 3 Mozilla just started senselessly bloating their software and version number) FOR XULRunner.

    So when a Hotel thinks it's funny to remove the IE Icon and then rename Firefox "Internet" I take great offense at that... It was the firefox idiots who intially started doing this on public computers, the whole "people don't care what they use, so force them to use firefox" is down right demeaning.

    And honestly, I don't like version 3's decision to use google api and send every address you type to google either, so unless I really need it, I'll use Firefox 2 for my XULRunner needs.

    These things should be MY choice
    MY BUISNESS

    If I don't want an update, I shouldn't be forced to update.
    If I don't want a new feature, I shouldn't be forced into said feature.
    And if I don't want to use firefox, I damn right as hell shouldn't be FORCED to use it (and then remove all firefox icons and add an iexplore icon as "Real Internet").

    Bloody firefox comunity needs to grow up

    and THEN, they need to kill off DHTML once and for all. Unless developers are willing to use it propperly, and in MODERATION, it's only slowing down the web.

    ReplyDelete