Throughout most of my lifetime, the American two-party system has met little serious
challenge. (“Third parties are
like bees: they sting, and then
they die.”) That hasn’t yet really
changed (anyone seen the Tea Party of late?): even the floridly contrarian candidates Trump and
Sanders chose a major-party banner
to run under (or in Trump’s case, perhaps to trample underfoot). Yet the public mood is indeed
evolving -- souring, mostly -- even if not in a way that so far has managed to
embody itself in an organized party with a positive platform. The movement is essentially negative,
or rather a congeries of semi-related negatives.
The phenomenon is not unexampled in our nation’s
history. In the early years of the
nineteenth century, Andrew Jackson came, for a time, to be the seed around
which contrarian sentiments nucleated:
Jacksonianism was
… a “persuasion”, a set of attitudes
united by little save discontent.
-- Wilson McWilliams, The Idea
of Fraternity in America (1973)
A prominent feature of the present mood, is simply not
believing what the government tells you (nor indeed anyone perceived as somehow
working for the government, such as climate scientists). And alas there has been much
matter, indicative of the wisdom of examining their statements from this angle
and that, and reserving judgment --
though surely politicians are no more egregiously peccant in this
respect, than beleaguered generals, gossipy neighbors, ex-wives, and anyone
trying to sell you something.
Again we notice widespread nineteenth-century precedents:
Missouri's nickname is The Show Me State. There are several
stories concerning the origin of the "Show Me" slogan. The most
widely known story gives credit to Missouri's U.S. Congressman Willard Duncan
Vandiver for coining the phrase in 1899. During a speech in Philadelphia, he
said:
"I come from a state that
raises corn and cotton and cockleburs and Democrats, and frothy eloquence
neither convinces nor satisfies me. I am from Missouri. You have got to show
me."
http://www.statesymbolsusa.org/symbol-official-item/missouri/state-nickname/show-me-state
(Melville features a relatively hard to bamboozle character
called the “Man from Missouri” in
his enigmatic 1857 sotie The
Confidence Man.)
So far as that goes, it is an expression of healthy
skepticism. The implication
is that the speaker is open to being
shown, given well-marshalled evidence.
A rung lower than this, this classic expression of popular
disbelief:
“Sez you” became the cry of
millions.
-- D. W. Brogan, The American
Character (1944), p. 92
(Mostly among men. For women, a couple of generations later, the
catchphrase was a less chin-out pugnacious, but even more utterly dismissive “What-ev-vahh…”)
Or again, the Studs Lonigans of the day:
He may fall back on “Oh, yeah” or
the more adequate “however you slice it, it’s still baloney.”
-- D. W. Brogan, The American
Character (1944), p. 164
(Cf. “I say
it’s broccoli, and I say the hell with it.”)
Such folks are, unlike the Missourian, not inviting you to “show
them” anything; but in many such
cases, attitudes are still subject to change, not perhaps via reasoned argument, but by such dramatic
images as may eventuate.
Rungs below that
is the attitude of systematic belief that scarcely deserves the name of “skepticism” at all, for
it simply does not engage in the practice of evidence-and-argument. Birthers, alien-abductionists,
conspiracy-theorists of various stripes, are no progeny of Diogenes; and their abstraction from the world of
fact would have baffled Aristotle.
~
For more on genuine skepticism versus lazy know-nothingism:
http://worldofdrjustice.blogspot.com/2013/05/chaos-coincidence-conspiracy.html
No comments:
Post a Comment