Thursday, September 20, 2012

Das Rauchvergnügen

Hans Castorp, über das Rauchvergnügen:

“Ich verstehe es nicht, wie jemand nicht rauchen kann. …
Wenn ich aufwache, so freue ich mich,
daß ich tagüber    werde rauchen dürfen; 
und wenn ich ess’,
so freu’ ich wieder d’rauf --
ja ich kann sagen,
daß ich eigentlich bloß esse,
um rauchen zu können …
-- Thomas Mann, Der Zauberberg (1924), v. I

Though I myself have long since ceased to smoke,
this I reprint, the better to offend
the bluenose, blue-stockinged, brown-nose coterie
of Puritans and Prohibitionists.



Anglicè :
http://worldofdrjustice.blogspot.com/2012/01/wovon-man-nicht-sprechen-kann-daruber.html

*

Falls Sie im Doktor-Justiz-Sammelsurium
weiterblättern möchten,
Bitte hier klicken:


Armageddon: a Scorecard (updated)

I always figured that, at the climax to the End Times, Wikipedia and Google would duke it out.  But maybe by then  it’ll be a three-way shoot-out, like at the finish of “The Good, Bad, and the Ugly”:

Amazon to World:

R U Basis Ist B Wrong 2 Us ! ! !


[Update 10 September 2012]  Yipes, now Apple wades in! http://worldofdrjustice.blogspot.com/2012/08/apple-vs-samsung.html

[Update 20 September 2012]  Omigosh, there’ll be yet a fifth gunman at the End Times Corral:


Wal-Mart said Thursday that it will stop carrying Amazon Kindle products in its stores after inventory is depleted.
Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer, competes fiercely with Amazon, which is ambitiously expanding the number of goods and services that it delivers straight to its customers — often through devices such as the Kindle e-reader and the Kindle Fire tablet. Retailers have been particularly critical of the online marketplace and its contribution to the trend of “showrooming.” They complain that customers often come into their brick-and-mortar stores to see or try out products that they’re interested in buying, only to leave and purchase the goods online, where customers often don’t have to pay sales taxes.


The nation's largest retailer has cut out the nation's largest e-tailer.
Wal-Mart will still carry devices including the Apple iPad, Google Nexus, Samsung Galaxy Tab and Barnes & Noble Nook.

This is beginning to look less like "The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly" and more like "The Wild Bunch".

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

“Minnie the Moocher”


Amid all the hand-wringing foofaraw around Mitt (Witt) “Sh*t” Romney’s dissing of the lowlife freeloaders who want to mooch off the hard-won gambling winnings of entities like Bain Capital and Sun Capital, no-one has remarked upon the most famous “moocher” of them all:  Minnie!

You can hear all about her here:

Live performance by the composer, Cab Calloway:
(Note:   The verses of the refrain, somewhat difficult of comprehension to non-specialists, are in the Coptic language.)

With awesome Betty-Boop graphics:
(Warning!   If you have ever ingested mescaline, peyote, or LSD, do not watch this video, or you may experience flashbacks.)

Pointless cover (which we link to only for its laugh-value) by a couple of no-talent whiteboys (no, not Romney&Ryan, but almost as bad):
(Best watched with the sound on “mute”).

Philological note:
From the lyrics:  “She was the roughest, toughest frail.”
Superficially, there would seem to be a contradiction.  Here is the explanation:

Frail is here a noun;  it is 1930s slang meaning ‘young woman’.   Perhaps indeed  in origin  it derives from the metaphor of “the weaker sex”; but if so, it very quickly lost that connotation, becoming a synonym of the later slang nouns broad (which does not conjure up images of women noted for their width), tomato (which does not evoke thoughts of Italian cooking), or (the queen of them all),  dame (related to madame, damsel and demoiselle).  Mugs and dames is a sort of further-downmarket equivalent of Guys and dolls. And if you don’t know what a dame is (take it from me:  there is nothing like one), then let Murphy tell you:



Here’s a basic thumbnail of a frail, combining fragility with femininity, from Jim Thompson’s classic noir of 1952, The Killer Inside Me:

She wasn’t much over five feet and a hundred pounds, and she looked a little scrawny around the neck and ankles.  But that was all right.  It was perfectly all right.  The good Lord had known just where to put that flesh where it would really do some good.

“Values Voters”


At the recent convention of Republican/Tea-Party “Values Voters”, Rich Santorum sniveled that social conservatives will never get a fair hearing in “the media” (a clip that was no doubt a hit on the Republican house-organ known as Murdoch Fox "News"), then went on to say something revealing:

            We will never have the elite -- smart people on our side.

The italics represent the intonation of the original (heard on the radio).

First, let us note:  Such an attitude is self-fulfilling.   The more the Republicans denouce “smart people” as such, the further they will firm up their impressive monopoly on morons.
Second, a linguistic sidelight.  We earlier commented on the well-documented phenomenon, of words originally coined as insults  being bravely adopted by their targets, and -- given fairly blameless behavior by the targeted groups, in what followed -- the words eventually becoming referential and emotionally neutral:  Tory, Quaker, and the like.  Now, this newish trend among rightwing Republicans (a descriptive phrase  that may eventually fuse  to a single word:  rightwingrepublican) is the converse of that:  You start with a perfectly neutral (or even positively-toned) word, and chant it over and over, with enough venom, that it becomes a hate-word for your clique.  This has happened notably with the term liberal -- a word etymologically related to liberty, and which for hundreds of years connoted ‘tolerant, generous’ (as in: “with a liberal hand”).  And now, it might happen with smart.

Allow me quickly to confess, that I have myself done something superficially similar on this site, by carefully cultivating, in post after post,  the term Nominalist as a term of abuse.   The difference is:
(1) No-one stupid enough to fall for the “chant-it-to-hate-it” approach has even heard of the term “Nominalist” (which has its home in medieval Christian theology, with stray surviving technical contemporary uses that do not overbrim the boundaries of Anglo-American analytic philosophy), nor have the least idea what I am talking about, on this subject or any other;
(2)  It’s funny, folks  -- satire -- metapolitics -- phree-phloating philosophy.

Anyhow, back to politics:  I am myself, as it happens, a Values Voter;  and some of the Values I value are:  competence, intelligence, honesty, humility, flexibility …   These we do not find in the current crop of upstart  TeaPublicans.

In terms of adherence to traditional Christian family values, I am so Attilic as to be a likely vir non gratus  in the tearooms of Bryn Mawr, as you can easily verify here:
But I would not vote for Romney-Ryan, Perry-Palin, or Beelzebub-Tr…. T-T-Trrr.. (omigosh, it’s sticking in my throat) T-T-T-T-T-TRrrrrrrrrrr ….. (ukhh!  the foul taste of the name!  it’s enough to make you barf -- omigosh -- it’s about to come out, in a stream of projectile vomiting)

Donald
TRR-RR-RRUMPP-P   !!!

-- wouldn’t vote for such trash  though you paid me or slayed me.

[Update 18 Sept 2012]  Another Value I rather value  is not posing as a squeaky-clean family man  while associating closely with utter scumbags:

Romney "47 Percent" Fundraiser Host: Hedge Fund Manager Who Likes Sex Parties

Romney’s remarks, elegantized


The Republican Presidential candidate, Mr. Thurston “Mitt” Howell-Romney, has conceded, under pressure, that his widely-circulated remarks dismissing the bulk of the electorate as teeming welchers and mooching scum, were “not elegantly expressed”.   They were, after all, addressed to a conclave of wealthy, highly tax-subsidized bankers and buyout artists and oilmen and real-estate developers and suchlike social parasites, in the notorious moocher state of Florida, and not intended for the highly educated (or, in Ryan’s or Santorum’s terms, overeducated) English majors with an ear for the elegant, most of whom are Democrats.

Accordingly, the candidate has been feverishly working on a more elegant version of his social philosophy, pouring out his innermost thoughts upon an Etch-a-Sketch ® balanced precariously on his bespoke-tailoring-clad knees, in the style known as “blank verse” which he remembers from English class back in prep school.
And once again, The World of Dr Justice ® scores a stunning media scoop.  One of our operatives who has inconspicuously infiltrated the campaign -- his cover being that he is a mere gofer and dogsbody, thus invisible to the candidate and his entourage -- was able to read the lines over the poet’s shoulder;  we print them here, as a WDJ exclusive.

Fie!  varlet -- lowly, base-born bloke.
Bring me quick my Cherry Coke ®
I’ll toss it back -- for thirst imposes --
then fling the can  in those prize roses.


*
*     *     *
~ Commercial break ~
Relief for beleaguered Nook lovers!
We now return you to your regularly scheduled essay.

*     *     *
Note to the metrically challenged:
That Registered-Trademark symbol at the end of the second line  is not intended to be pronounced, as it would be extrametrical, and  moreover  spoil the rhyme.  We print it purely to safeguard the legal and commercial rights of corporations -- who, after all, are people too.



~
~  Posthumous Endorsement ~
"If I were alive today, and in the mood for a mystery,
this is what I'd be reading: "
(I am Alexander Hamilton, and I approved this message.)
~         ~
~


For background on the Coke-can incident, click here:

For further poetical treasures, exclusive to this site, unearthed by the WDJ Elizabethan Team ©, click here:


For some of our books and stories, here:
http://www.linguasacrapublishing.com/justice.html


[Update 2 October 2012]  Among the moochers:

The headline apparently understates the case.  A fairish number of Americans are “millionaires” (a term deflated by inflation) in the sense that their total family assets reach that amount.   But those on this dole apparently include a much more select bunch: “Oct. 2 (Bloomberg) -- Almost 2,400 people who received unemployment insurance in 2009 lived in households with annual incomes of $1 million or more, according to the Congressional Research Service.”  That is quite a different matter.  And bad cess to the WaPo headline-writer who cannot read as far as the first line of the article.

 

Monday, September 17, 2012

The Philosophy of Doctor Justice: A Very Short Introduction


Occasionally  readers write in, complaining that my essays are abstruse.  This is certainly not my intention, the difficulty lying  rather  in the matter at hand.   And this, being deep, must not  in any way  be “dumbed down”.
Nevertheless:  Propaedeutics, Prolegomena to any future Pataphysics, Einführungen of every sort,  are more than welcome.

Accordingly, I conceived the plan of simply linking to the classic ditty “Where is Thumbkin?” on YouTube.  We learned said song in kindergarten (there in Ridgewood, New Jersey, back in 1955), and it pretty much determined the later course of my life and thought.  And so I searched on this, and it brought up several videos, but -- none of these served the purpose!  In the worst, most horrible instantiations, only some of the five fingers were treated, thus maiming the children for life and no doubt engendering that modern scourge, Amputee Identity Disorder.   Others treated all five, but -- under different names from those we had so painstakingly learned, back under nice Mister Eisenhower -- us trusting, sitting on the floor, as Mrs. M. doggedly played the piano  and the sun shone yellowly beyond the windowpane (much as it had shone upon King Alfred, though we children did not know that at the time).  For instance -- instead of “pinky”, one YouTube version called the little-finger “baby” -- Tilt !!!

I failed to find a single video  fit to link to.  Hence, no quick ‘n’ easy intro to Doc J’s Philosophy  after all.  Our mood-ring today reads:  Towering Rage.

Now, this is a reasonably big deal.  You are familiar with the concept “All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten”.  Well, about all I learned in kindergarten, apart from “Oh Where Oh Where Has My Little Dog Gone” (a tuneful ode, but one which, in later life, I have seldom or rather never  been called upon to perform at dinner-parties) was the names of the fingers.   And even this precious ladleful of knowledge  seems to have been spilt by history  and lost to the world.

We have strayed into sensitive territory here.  For, proud as I was of the detailed lore that had been vouchsafed to us as five-year-olds, it was a trauma as severe as any that affected Little Hans  when I eventually came to learn that the generality of mankind  does not, in fact, refer to the index finger as “pointer”,  nor the medius or digitus impudicus as “tall man”.  Indeed, the only denomination that survived into adulthood was “pinky” -- and as noted above, even that has been discarded in the bastardized latterday lyrics of the song.

And so, as a public service,
we here present the OFFICIAL LYRICS  of  “Where is Thumbkin”,
as recorded in Mrs. Macguire’s kindergarten class,
wa-ay  back   …..   in     1955

[As you start, both hands behind your back]
Where is Thumbkin?  [bring out right hand, with closed fist]
Where is Thumbkin?  [bring out left hand, with closed fist]

-- From the standpoint of philosophy, we cannot forbear to observe:  What an excellent question that is!  Where, after all, is Thumbkin?  At this point, does he lie latent, perdu  within the fist, like the statue-to-be within the as-yet-unchiseled block of marble  -- subsisting rather than existing (to adopt the terminology of our later teacher Mister Meinong)?
 
Ahem;  to resume.

Here I am! [right thumb pops up]
Here I am! [left thumb pops up]

This time, the literary critic in me  simply must interrupt.
Such freshness of expression, such right-on-target minimalism,  was never seen by the world until “Sumer is icumen in”;  and never equalled since, until this poem.

Mmmyess;  we return to the topic.

-- “How are you today, sir!”  [right thumb repeatedly bows]
-- “Very well I thank you.” [left thumb repeatedly bows]

Again, the homme de lettres  cannot restrain himself.   How splendid!  How purely Elizabethan!   On tire sa révérence, for all the world like  Click and Clack    or the Two Gentlemen of Verona.
Truly, for our youth, this simple scene is an exemplar of manners.

Run   a-   way.  [right hand whisks back out of sight]
Run   a-   way.  [left hand whisks back out of sight]

Truly, at this point, the critic is left speechless:  Eulogy, beggared, hobbles kneeling, and praises mute.
This superficially comedic, and underlyingly tragic  passage,  unites the childish love of “hiding”, with the memento mori, and the mystery of Death.

Directions to the teacher:
Repeat as above, but now with the names  pointer; tall-man; lame-man; pinky, and with substitution of the appropriate finger.

Philological observation:
One can well understand how, in later and degraded versions, lame-man should have been replaced by the more readily understandable (though not necessarily so to a preschooler) “ring-man”.    But lame-man, in the spirit of the Bard, penetrates to the essence of our incarnated being, whereas ring-man is a purely contingent Eurocentric datapoint.

Economics 102 (bis)

(That is -- a step beyond Economics 101.)

Note:   Economics has the reputation of being dry-as-dust (“the dismal science”, thus dubbed by its own practitioners).   And in the  public arena (free-coinage-of-silver, Reaganomics) America has a long history of “voodoo economics” (in the famous phrase of Reagan’s OMB director David Stockman, characterizing the economic fantasies of his boss).   Yet some very distinguished work has been done, some of it of interest not only to specialists, but touching over into contiguous fields. 

In solidarity with our son, now a math major taking freshman economics, we offer links to insightful commentary in the economic field.  The list should grow with time, so check back occasionally.

(1) iPhones and liquidity traps
A somewhat subtle argument, from a Nobelist; still mulling it over myself.
In any event, it is good to find economic arguments in the MSM  that stimulate thought, rather than the podex.


(2) “Falsifiability”

From economist and former Treasury secretary Larry Summers:

It is the mark of science, and perhaps rational thought more generally, to operate with a falsifiable understanding of how the world operates. So it is fair to ask economists what could cause them to substantially revise their views of how the economy operates and to acknowledge that the model they had been using was substantially flawed. As a vigorous advocate of fiscal expansion as an appropriate response to a major slump in an economy with interest rates near zero, I have long said that if the British economy were to enjoy a rapid recovery, it would force me to substantially revise my views about fiscal policy and the workings of the macroeconomy more generally.
Unfortunately for the British economy, nothing in the past several years compels me to revise my views.

This term falsifiable could easily be misunderstood.  It is a term of art in the Philosophy of Science, and denotes a good thing.  In one homely formulation, “a theory needs to stick its neck out”:  meaning, we need to be clear on what would count as counterevidence to our thesis.
Strictly, this concept of “falsifiability” can apply to any would-be-empirical statement at all, not merely statements that are theoretical or scientific.   But scarcely anything we say can actually meet this exacting standard.

Note:  Professor Summers is given to statements that, while impeccably correct, can be misunderstood -- in particular, wilfully misunderstood.  While President of Harvard, he made a statement based upon the statistical facts of leptokurtosis;  this was met with enraged howls, and he was hounded from his job.


(3)  Word of the Day:  “liquidationism”

I know, I know; it’s lazy of me to keep linking to Krugman articles, but the man really does write both acutely and enertainingly.   And we owe him a debt of gratitude for continuing to wage the good fight, year after year, rather than simply tossing his pen aside in boredom and disgust (as a lesser man, such as myself, would have done, when Dubya won re-election).

Romney’s language echoed that of the “liquidationists” of the 1930s, who argued against doing anything to mitigate the Great Depression.

(4)  David Stockman on “too big to fail” vs. “too big to exist


(5)  An economics thriller


A remarkably gripping movie-documentary, which feels more like a business thriller such as “Duplicity” than a 60 Minutes exposé, is “Inside Job”  (2010).


Cannily, the film begins, not with the hot wet empirical messiness of America, but with the cool and virtually in-vitro example of Iceland,  which suffered a spectacular economic meltdown after its banks were deregulated and privatized.  Capital is global, and the vices and greeds of speculators are akin  all over the world.
One of the villains of the piece  is Larry Summers, the same whom we treated more kindly above.   His economic prescriptions certainly enjoyed the philosophy-of-science virtue of being “falsifiable”;  and they have been falsified.  Does he, or anyone else who once held them, admit this?

Bugburg: A Bird’s-Eye View

 
Bug.   *         A bug.  *
…    ……       ……..     Another bug.  *
…    …..      ……….
    A bug.   *



(And now we give equal time to the bug’s perspective:
http://worldofdrjustice.blogspot.com/2012/09/this-mornings-new-web.html