Betcha didn’t know I was a pugilist, huh? Well, not professionally; “a lover, not a fighter”, as the saying
goes, and as many a Mädchen can attest.
Only twice in my life have
I actually been involved in fisticuffs.
(1) The first occurred when I was about seven or eight, back when Eisenhower was in flower. It happened at the dead end of
Mulberry Place. What
occasioned the fight, I have not the slightest idea -- some stupid kid
thing. But the key point here is
that I had squared off with someone both taller and older than I was. It was in a yard beside this same
cul-de-sac that we all played a hyperdemocratic game of pickup baseball, with
rules tailored to the age and size and talents of each individual player (unlimited
strikes allowed to the peewees) [French has a term for this: it's called playing "pour du beurre"]: and this leveling sentiment applied now. For, though I was a fairly dim figure
on the periphery of the Mulberry Place gang, I was pleased and startled to hear
the crowd (apparently) cheering me as my opponent and I circled each other,
neither having yet landed a blow. Playing no personal favorites, but
in accord with the neighborhood children’s proto-Maoist bias towards the
underdog, in unison they chanted:
Fight -- Fight -- N*gger and White!
Come on, Justice -- Beat that
White!
(All the children in the neighborhood were white; the chant had a certain impish novelty.)
The match soon petered out without issue. Who my opponent had been, again I have no idea -- not someone I knew well. All I recall is the warm glow of having been (seemingly) backed by vox populi. Yet since then, a couple of nuancing considerations have occurred to me:
The match soon petered out without issue. Who my opponent had been, again I have no idea -- not someone I knew well. All I recall is the warm glow of having been (seemingly) backed by vox populi. Yet since then, a couple of nuancing considerations have occurred to me:
(a) In the context of the racial assumptions of the time (ca.
1957), the chant could easily be interpreted as ironic -- a “left-handed compliment”, as the
saying goes. I was only seven, and
had not yet been exposed to such attitudes by my liberal-Unitarian parents, so
I didn’t get that at all.
(b) That much is obvious to any contemporary adult. But -- a subtler, linguistic point. Namely: We children had only a very
limited repertoire of stereotyped chants. So the production of this one (which I have never heard
before or since) doesn’t necessarily exactly mean anything, neither in denigration nor support of the lad nominally
addressed. It was just something
to say at the time.
(2) The Stamm family was really nice to
me. Their son Bob and I were best
friends. They sometimes took me on
family jaunts to Bear Mountain, places like that. We had lots of fun.
But
one time -- I must have been about ten or eleven -- on one such rural
retreat, despite the mild sunny
weather that should have proved soothing, somehow Bob and I got into a scuffle
-- again, for a reason utterly forgotten, but undoubtedly trivial and
stupid.
His
parents and little sister were standing right there, as we shoved and wrestled
(but did not punch) there on the sylvan greensward -- a venue in which the
penning of pastoral poetry might more profitably have occupied our time. Soon the father intervened -- as any
adult would -- saying “Break it up, boys.” We did.
But
then (essaying a loftier level of guidance) he added: “Shake and make up.”
Warily,
we each extended our right hand.
And clasped. -- At which
point, Bob let loose with his left, and clipped me on the ear.
Uproar. His father of course was mortified, to
a degree I intuited to some extent even then, though could fully appreciate
only much later, when fatherhood fell in turn to my lot. Naturally, at the time, I felt a
certain smugness at this unexpected turn of events.
Yet
again, with the passage of years, a deeper level of understanding rises to the level of
consciousness. For, though Bob was
of course wrong to throw a sucker-punch, his father had been overambitious in
prescribing a formal reconciliation
so soon. Emotions have
their meaning, and their own inertia, and need to subside of their own
accord: to attempt thus externally
to command them, is like Canute commanding the waves. Bob understandably was not yet ready to “shake and make up”. Such is not an unusual state of affairs after
bloody broils. Woodrow Wilson
attempted a similarly irenic gesture (the “Fourteen Points”) at the close of
the Great War, to as little effect.
[Footnote:
Though Bob was the only one to actually land a punch in this contest,
and thus would formally have won on points, I still believe I could have taken
him in a fair fight. -- Ha!]
[Philological footnote: A Scarboro warning is a traditional English catch-phrase for "the blow before the word".]
[Philological footnote: A Scarboro warning is a traditional English catch-phrase for "the blow before the word".]
(3) Right, I
said “twice”, so what’s this third bullet-point doing here? Well, it concerns the one time I almost got into a fistfight, but
ultimately didn’t.
This happened much much later; I was twenty-two or so. And living an exceedingly impecunious bohemian life in
Berkeley, with no job, and having dropped out of the graduate program in
mathematics owing to inability to pay the out-of-state tuition they were
charging . In short, not
much of a marital prospect. And
yet, young S. (who was, incidentally, and still is, the most beautiful girl in
the world, though this detail is not strictly germane to our story) had for
some reason taken a fancy to me, and set her cap for (as it proved)
matrimony; as a result of which we
were (to use the expressions of a more decorous era) “seeing a lot of each other”,
or “keeping company", or even (as you might say) “courting”.
All very well:
But her former/current/not-yet-repudiated boyfriend, whom she had been
dating since high school, thought otherwise. -- Understandably so:
When I think back to that tiny roominghouse-room in which I then
dwelled, unable to afford so much as a telephone, usually clad in a
chemical-blasted labcoat from freshman year, and finding any further apparel,
either at St. Vincent De Paul, or in the garbage-can in the alley adjoining, it
is difficult to fault him in his doubting my sincerity, or my suitability as a
“catch”.
Anyhow, he came up to my dwelling in a white heat, demanding
that I renounce all interest in the maiden, upon pain of something
painful. At which point I
deployed, not my golden gloves, but my silver tongue. Which soon succeeded in soothing him, and convincing him of
my bona fides. (And lest you think
this scoundrelly, I actually did marry her shortly thereafter;
and we are still together, till death us depart.)
Ruefully, he admitted the legitimacy of my position, and her
own right to choose her beau;
adding, as he departed,
“I’d come up with the intention of thrashing you.”
Well, fine; I
let this pass; but again, the
male, red of blood and sinew, the blood of Beowulf flowing in his veins, does
not lightly sit down for such a thing. Just as with the epic (not) Justice-Stamm bout, I silently coolly assessed that, given
his age and build (about the same as mine), but in view of my own unsuspected
reserves of ferocity (which later would manifest themselves with a vengeance,
in the other S., my iron-fisted son), --
had the matter come to that, -- --
I coulda took ‘im.
[Update 21 August 2014] Today my bride and I are celebrating our thirty-eighth wedding anniversary; thanks be to God. And our son has outgrown the fists-up stage, and is now industriously pursuing mathematics.
For a glimpse of all three of us, click here:
http://www.linguasacrapublishing.com/justice.html
[Update 21 August 2014] Today my bride and I are celebrating our thirty-eighth wedding anniversary; thanks be to God. And our son has outgrown the fists-up stage, and is now industriously pursuing mathematics.
For a glimpse of all three of us, click here:
http://www.linguasacrapublishing.com/justice.html
No comments:
Post a Comment