Choice quotes from selected
essays. For the context, click on
the link.
Quine, who likes
his whisky neat and his universes spare, takes an opposite tack, that of
“entities explained away” (with the aid of variables and quantifiers),
abolishing those unaesthetic singular terms. Here Pegasus disappears in a puff of “pegasizing”.
In focusing on definition, I am inadvertently revealing the déformation professionelle of one who used to earn his bread (or
rather his hardtack; the profession is ill-paid) as a lexicographer. For, rather than trying to say
what a thing “is” (and here the Korzybskian strictures against the copula have their full force), we may say,
pragmatically rather than ontologically, what a thing is for.
Nicht vom Wetter spricht sie, nicht
vom Schneider,
höchstens von den
Grundproblemen beider.
-- Christian Morgenstern
Our purpose is twofold; indeed, the twin goals “can be thought
of” as dual to each other. The ostensible aim is (lightly)
mathematical: to provide pithy
thumbnail sketches of complex fields of research. The more substantial project takes place rather in the
lexicographic ‘conjugate space’ which
maps the items so defined into
intuitive English.
This, by contrast with the more
traditional understanding of names achieving their reference via matching some
understood description -- you manage
to pick out Aristotle from amidst the hordes of shades, by his embodying
certain characteristics -- teacher of Alexander, author of the Organon, known to his homeys as “the
Stagirite”. http://worldofdrjustice.blogspot.com/2013/07/naming-necessity.html
“Not a ‘triplex of mutually
orthogonal rabbit-slices’, dammit!
I mean three separate rabbits !!”
But here Quine is surely correct,
as regards the sequential ontologenesis.
Initially, Mama simply is what she
is, as presented: Die Mutti ohne Eigenschaften, as it were.
Our bow to Gleason’s semantic
precisionism is not by way of
fetishizing fine distinctions.
More boredom thou shalt never see
than Tarski’s Truth Convention T.
In the next-inner circle of the
petting zoo, qualified visitors may pet bunnies in their paradoxical yet
intimate homoousian duality: Fully
Temporal-rabbit-stage, yet fully Rabbit…
We have had several occasions to to
hail that celebrated ontologist, gentleman, astronaut and circus-clown (for
such he might have been, in a parallel universe), Professor Alexius Meinong.
It is our theory that all sentences
whatever of a natural language such as English, whether posed in the
declarative, interrogative, or exclamatory mode, contain direct or indirect
references to penguins. http://worldofdrjustice.blogspot.com/2013/02/some-problems-of-philosphy.html
Here we learn that “Nominalists
hold that there are no numbers”; this involves them in certain
epistemological difficulties. But en revanche (ô doulce revanche), numbers hold that there are no
nominalists. This involves them in no difficulties at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment