Our principle series of essays on causality may be consulted here:
As a follow-up, just a couple of footnotes. Rather than work them into the essays
where they might be most relevant, we publish them apart, since the
philosophical and scientific interests
are cross-cutting.
Freud was deeply imbued with the
principles of causality and determinism, so pronounced in the Helmholtz school
that had dominated his early scientific discipline. Instead of dismissing the wandering associations as accidental, unconected, and
meaningless … he felt intuitively that there must be some definite agency …
guiding and degtermining the course of these thoughts.
-- Ernest Jones, Freud: the
Formative Years (1953), p. 45
Terminology: Here we see a number of causation-related terms
used rather kunterbunt:
Für die Wissenschaft erhob sich alsbald die Frage, ob der Anreiz zum Träumen
stets der nämliche sei, oder ein vielfacher sein könne, und damit die
Erwägung, ob sie ursächliche Erklärung
des Traumes der Psychologie oder vielmehr der Physiologie anheimfalle. Die meisten Autoren scheinen anzunehmen, daß die
Ursachen der Schlafstörung, also die Quellen des
Träumens, mannigfaltiger Art sein können, und daß Leibreize ebenso wie seelische Erregungen zur Rolle von Traumerregern gelangen.
-- Sigmund Freud, Die
Traumdeutung (1899)
For his part, Freud’s wayward onetime-disciple Jung is well known for his notion of
“synchronicity, an acausal connecting principle”.
Brücke would have been astonished had he known that one of his favorite
pupils, [Freud], was later … to bring back into science the ideas of “purpose”, “intention”,
and “aim” , which had just been abolished from the universe. [Nevertheless,
Freud] never abandoned determinism for teleology.
-- Ernest Jones, Freud: the
Formative Years (1953), p. 45
Jung greatly de-emphasized determinism, both in theory and
in therapy.
No comments:
Post a Comment