When you blog about as many subjects as I do (sometimes late
at night, after I’ve had a few, when wiser men would already be abed), you
inevitably wind up occasionally putting your foot in it, and wind up having to
apologize all round. (If
this continues, I may have to join the Republican Party; they never apologize.) This
latest example is one of many.
In this essay,
we quoted the following blameless paragraph, and rattled on
about it with inexcusable cluelessness:
To assert that topoi correspond to
theories is not to deny that
certain topoi may be viewed as models for our logic. Models may be described syntactically by “diagrams”, so
theories may be said to include models.
Our point is that, in general, topoi may be viewed as theories. In particular, some topoi which arise
semantically are better understood
as theories than as models. Thus
we regard topos theory as the “algebraic” form of this higher-order
intuitionistic logic.
-- Michael Fourman, in the introductory first paragraph of
“The Logic of Topoi”, in: Jon Barwise, ed. Handbook of Mathematical Logic
(1977), p. 1054
That may well be a modern exemplar of the expository
art; but at the time, I was too
dense to realize that.
Accordingly, older and, if not wiser, at least sober,
I have emended that essay with the following heaping serving of humble pie (contents: crow):
I happened to reread this last
section just now, and found my then-remarks quite stupid. I would delete it, or apologize for
posting it, except that, after all, the point of this essay is to share with
you the wrenching sense of what it feels like to be this stupid, so that you
will stop moaning over orphaned teddy-bears in Borriobooola and quit sending
them all your aluminum pull-tabs
and instead contribute to a Riemann-related
charity such as the Dr
Justice Retirement Yacht Fund (all contributions tax-deductible for
citizens of Antarctica, donations in Swiss francs only please).
However, the good or at least
less-than-awful news is that, upon mature reflection, the quoted passage about theories and topoi seems much more
straightforward and intriguing, then it did back then; sparking perhaps even a glimmer of understanding. In fact, I’d like to retire from
my day-job right now and study this subject on my, um, yacht …
In fact -- With a small amount of encouragement, I would
gladly shut up forever and quit blogging, and just go tooling around the
Mediterranean, contemplating the infinite and determining which IPAs make the
best chasers for which Outer-Hebrides single-malts. And with this we kick off our
(Donations accepted in Schweizerfranken
or bullion; please no dollars or
second-party food-stamps.)
No comments:
Post a Comment