Don’t get me wrong -- Apple isn’t particularly more evil
than a lot of other tyrannical behemoths;
it has a lot of competition in that department. But with the news of the iPhone6
with i0S8 offering semi-unbreakable encryption with no law-enforcement back
door, it has brazenly allied itself with criminals.
Already the new phone has led to an
eruption from the director of the F.B.I., James
B. Comey. At a news conference on
Thursday devoted largely to combating terror threats from the Islamic State,
Mr. Comey said, “What concerns me about
this is companies marketing something expressly to allow people to hold
themselves beyond the law.”
He cited kidnapping cases, in which
exploiting the contents of a seized phone could lead to finding a victim, and
predicted there would be moments when parents would come to him “with tears in
their eyes, look at me and say, ‘What do you mean you can’t’ ” decode the
contents of a phone.
“The notion that someone would market a closet that could never be
opened — even if it involves a case involving a child kidnapper and a court
order — to me does not make any sense.”
Apple declined to comment. But
officials inside the intelligence agencies, while letting the F.B.I. make the
public protests, say they fear the company’s move is the first of several new
technologies that are clearly designed to defeat not only the N.S.A., but also
any court orders to turn over information to intelligence agencies. They liken
Apple’s move to the early days of Swiss banking, when secret accounts were set
up precisely to allow national laws to be evaded.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/27/technology/iphone-locks-out-the-nsa-signaling-a-post-snowden-era-.html?_r=0
If that kidnapping scenario should come to pass (and that is
not in the least far-fetched; we’re
in the middle of one right now in Charlottesville), and someone dies because of
Apple’s giving the finger to law enforcement, they will be in the position of
Dr Strangelove, whose very clever Doomsday Machine had unanticipated consequences. Only, these are
easy to anticipate. Felony
accomplice before the fact? Apple
execs in handcuffs, or assaulted by an enraged mob?
(Justy to clarify, in case it isn’t
obvious: It’s fine that everything on the phone is encrypted, bravo; fine that a court order should be
required to obtain the keys to unlock the encryption. What is not fine, is that the keys should nowhere exist.)
~
To get hold of a perp’s cell, you usually have to catch the
perp; and that cuts down on the
number of times a “ticking bomb” scenario could arise. But there are plenty of possible
scenarios in which law enforcement would have a legitimate reason to access the
contents of a cellphone, even one that did
not belong to the criminals or their accomplices.
Thus, to stray no farther than the University of Virginia
case already mentioned. …
[To be continued]
For some schadenfreude:
http://www.euronews.com/2014/09/26/launch-of-iphone6-staggers-from-disaster-to-derision/
For Cato the Elder’s take on other evil Apple antics:
http://worldofdrjustice.blogspot.com/2012/08/flash-apple-declares-bankruptcy.html
[Disclosure:
Writing this on a Mac … ]
No comments:
Post a Comment