[In accord with the sudden frenzy of interest in humble woodchucks
on the World Wide Web -- the epicenter of which, oddly, would appear to
be located in the southern Ukraine -- we are posting this urgent
bulletin. Please tweet this to everyone you've ever met, or might meet
someday in the future, or in the after-life.]
Top-flight scientists making highly precise measurements have found an answer to the age-old question. And the answer is:
If (counterfactual assumption) a woodchuck could chuck wood, then (apodosis) it would chuck: a peck.
(NSF grant #Ops2B-911-6600.)
[ Update: For more, like, really smart science-y stuff, check this out.]
[ For a swell sonnet about the Humble Woodchuck, click here. ]
And if (for some unfathomable reason) you personally don't actually like woodchucks,
the following video is guaranteed Woodchuck-Free:
.
[ Update: For more, like, really smart science-y stuff, check this out.]
[ For a swell sonnet about the Humble Woodchuck, click here. ]
And if (for some unfathomable reason) you personally don't actually like woodchucks,
the following video is guaranteed Woodchuck-Free:
.
No comments:
Post a Comment